Information Assurance -Last update 11 Aug 2002

 

Congressional Security Acts

 

GAO: US cyber security efforts are uncoordinated. A congressional report released on 22 July identifies no less than 50 different federal organizations sharing responsibility for protecting critical infrastructures from cyber attack, and warns that they're in desperate need of a consistent strategy to glue them together. The General Accounting Office found despite the tangle of bureaucracy thrown at the problem, critical networks remain vulnerable to cyber attack and that relationships among organizations performing similar critical infrastructure protection activities were ill-defined and inconsistent. The report urged the White House to better define the key federal agencies' cyber security roles in its upcoming National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace, due for release in September. (Security Focus, 22 Jul)

 

Cyber Security Research and Development Act

Cyber Security Research and Development Act - Authorizes appropriations, to the National Science Foundation (NSF) and to the Secretary of Commerce for the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), to establish new programs and to increase funding for certain current programs for computer and network security research and development and research fellowships. Requires the NSF Director to award grants for computer and network security through the following: (1) basic research in innovative approaches to the structure of their hardware and software; (2) multidisciplinary research centers, through institutions of higher education (IHEs) or their consortia which may partner with government laboratories or for-profit institutions; (3) undergraduate and master's degree programs, as well as education-related grants under the Scientific and Advanced Technology Act of 1992; (4) graduate traineeships; and (5) graduate research fellowships. Amends the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 to include among NSF functions leading in supporting research and education activities to improve networked information systems' security. Amends the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act to require the NIST Director to establish a program of assistance to IHEs that enter into partnerships with for-profit entities to support research to improve the security of computer systems. Requires NIST to carry out specified types of intramural computer security research. Requires the NIST Director to arrange with the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences to study and report to Congress on critical infrastructure weaknesses.

 

Government Information Security Reform Act (GISRA) 2000

Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) 2002

-makes GISRA permanent-follow NIST policy without exception 

Online InfoSec Books

Firewalls Complete

http://secinf.net/info/fw/complete/

 

Handbook of Applied Cryptography

http://www.cacr.math.uwaterloo.ca/hac/

 

Information Security Publications

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/technology/techpolicy/security/

National Journal

 

Information Assurance News, Information Assurance Support Element

 

National Infrastructure Protection Center - Cybernotes

 

FedCirc- Bits and Bytes

 

Daily CyberCrime and Security Report

http://www.newsfactor.com/perl/story/19151.html

 

Infoworld-Security

 

Information Week – Security Tech Center

 

Network Magazine – Security Tutorials

 

Network World

http://www.nwfusion.com/topics/security.html

http://www.nwfusion.com/supp/security2002/

 

Computerworld-Security Knowledge Center

 

Computerworld-Security Special Report

 

Information Assurance Technology Analysis Center (IATAC)

Publishes IANewsletter. Good Reading on Government IA initiatives.

 

Intelligence Enterprise-Privacy and Security

 http://www.intelligententerprise.com/info_centers/privacy/

Information Security Magazine

 

Security Business Quarterly

Published by @stake, only online distribution, excellent publication

 

Security Focus   Author Wong, Chief Executive Officer  San Mateo, California

Author Wong, Chief Executive Officer

Oliver Friedrichs, Director of Engineering

Security Focus DeepSight Threat Management System, collects and correlates data from more than 14,000 network intrusion-detection, firewall and router devices located on thousands of university, corporate and government networks in 150 countries. Formerly called Attack Registry and Intelligence Service, it tracked its one-billionth security incident after 18 months in operation. SecurityFocus sold to Symantec in July 2002.

 

TechUpdate- Security

http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/filters/mrc/0,14175,6020424,00.html

 

The Encyclopedia of Computer Security

http://www.itsecurity.com/defaultie5.htm

 

Information Assurance Advisory Council

http://www.iaac.org.uk/

 

Network Security Library

http://secinf.net/policye/html

 

Federal Government Information Security

 

GAO: US cyber security efforts are uncoordinated. A congressional report  released on 22 July identifies no less than 50 different federal organizations sharing responsibility for protecting critical infrastructures from cyber attack, and warns that they're in desperate need of a consistent strategy to glue them together. The General Accounting Office found despite the tangle of bureaucracy thrown at the problem, critical networks remain vulnerable to cyber attack and that relationships among organizations performing similar critical infrastructure protection activities were ill-defined and inconsistent. The report urged the White House to better define the key federal agencies' cyber security roles in its upcoming National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace, due for release in September. (Security Focus, 22 Jul)

 

Central Intelligence Agency

DCID 6/3

Information Security requirements for the Intelligence Community. Signed by CIA Director April 1999.

 

The National Colloquium for Information Systems Security Education (NCISSC) was created during 1997 to provide a forum for leading figures in government, industry and academia to work in partnership to define current and emerging requirements for information systems security education. The goal of the Colloquium is to influence and encourage the development of information security curricula, especially at the graduate and undergraduate levels. The Colloquium history and charter may be found at http://www.ncisse.org. Chairmanship of the Colloquium rotates annually among government, academia and industry. Check the website for information on the annual conference. An important outcome of the Colloquium is the sharing of knowledge and resources through Colloquium web sites which currently contain course materials on Ethics in Computing http://www.infosec.jmu.edu/computerethics, Risk Management, and Malicious Logic.

Appendix III to OMB Circular No. A-130 - Security of Federal Automated Information

http://www.osec.doc.gov/cio/oipr/newaiii.htm

 

Federal Agency Security Practices

http://csrc.nist.gov/fasp/

 

NIST Computer Security Handbook

http://csrc.nust.gov/nistpubs

 

Common Criteria

http://niap.nist.gov/cc-scheme

 

International Common Criteria

www.commoncriteria.org

 

FIPS 140-1 and 140-2 Specifications & Current Validation Modules

http://csrc.nist.gov/cryptval/

 

NIAP Validated Products List (VPL)

http://niap.nist.gov/cc-scheme/ValidatedProducts.html

http://niap.nist.gov/cc-scheme/PPRegistry.html

 

Information Assurance Technical Framework

NSA/NIST US Government recommended Protection Profiles

www.iatf.net

 

FedCIRC

http://www.fedcirc.gov/index.html

 

The U.S. Department of Energy- Computer Incident Advisory Capability

http://www.ciac.org/ciac/

 

Department of Defense

 

The Government Information Security Reform Act is requiring action. The new Draft DoD Information Assurance Policy and Instruction are capstone documents to be used for building an Information Assurance Program that is documented and measurable, specifically referred to as DoDD 8500.aa and DoDI 8500.bb. The widely accepted approach to Defense in Depth has established a methodology for addressing network and information security concerns. Using these guidelines and requirements, coupled with currently available information, we can design a framework that will support any organization and tailor it to fit our individual business needs.

 

Defense Information Technology Certification and Accreditation Process (DITSCAP). Prescribes all the steps required to assess, assign, implement, and audit the information security environment. The DITSCAP umbrella methodology includes everything from risk assessment and management issues, to complete certification and accreditation of all systems and the network.

 

Special Information Operations (SIO)

(DOD) Information operations that by their sensitive nature and due to their potential effect or impact, security requirements, or risk to the national security of the United States, require a special review and approval process. Also called SIO. See also information; information operations; operation.


Directorate for C4 systems-Joint Staff experts on C4

http://www.dtic.mil/jcs/core/j6.html

535 page PDF document that outlines DoD wide Information Assurance policy.

 

Joint publication 3-13 Rev1 - Joint Doctrine for Information Operations

Joint publication 3-13.1 Rev1 - Joint Doctrine for Command and Control Warfare (C2W)

Department of Defense Annual Reports

http://www.defenselink.mil/execsec/index.html

Rumsfeld said the military now has six operational goals:

o Protect the U.S. homeland and defeat weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery.

o Project and sustain power in distant anti-access and area-denial environments.

o Deny enemy sanctuary by developing capabilities for persistent surveillance, tracking and rapid engagement.

o Leverage information technologies and innovative network- centric concepts to link joint forces.

o Protect information systems from attack.

o Maintain unhindered access to space and protect U.S. Space capabilities from enemy attack.

 

Department of Defense

John Stenbit, CIO

www.c3i.osd.mil

 

DoD Information Assurance Office

www.c3i.osd.mil/org/sio/ia/diap

 

DoD Information Assurance Scholarship Program

http://www.c3i.osd.mil/iasp/

 

DoD Information Assurance Support Environment

http://iase.disa.mil/

http://mattche.iiie.disa.mil

 

DoD Computer Emergency Response Team

http://www.cert.mil/

 

DoD Computer Forensics Laboratory

AFOSI is the executive agent for DoD for the DoD Computer Forensics Laboratory. Publishes excellent newsletter on computer forensics

www.dcfl.gov

 

DoD Information Operations

 

23rd Information Operations Squadron

Gregory J. Rattray is a Lieutenant Colonel in the US Air Force. He is currently commander of the 23rd Information Operations Squadron responsible for information warfare tactics development. He has served on the Headquarters Air Force and Headquarters Strategic Air Command staffs and as Assistant Professor of Political Science at the USAF Academy. Bruce Berkowitz  review of LTC Rattray's book on Information Warfare: http://www.nap.edu/issues/18.2/br_berkowitz.html

 

Paper on Information Operations to Air Force 2025

http://www.au.af.mil/au/2025/volume3/chap02/v3c2-1.htm#Contents

 

Critical Infrastrucure Protection in the United States Ralf Bendrath, Berlin FoG:IS Forschungsgruppe Research Group

http://www.isn.ethz.ch/crn/extended/workshop_zh/ppt/Bendrath/index.htm 

 

INFORMATION OPERATIONS "IO in a Peace Enforcement Environment"

http://call.army.mil/products/newsltrs/99-2/99-2toc.htm

 

Joint Task Force-Computer Network Operations

http://www.spacecom.mil/jtf-cno.htm

The Joint Task Force-Computer Network Operations (JTF-CNO) is the Commander-in-Chief, United States Space Command’s (USCINCSPACE) operational component for Computer Network Operations (CNO), and supports USCINCSPACE in the integration of Computer Network Defense and Computer Network Attack capabilities into the operations of US military forces. Computer Network Operations are comprised of two specific yet complementary mission areas: Computer Network Defense (CND) and Computer Network Attack (CNA). The CND mission is to defend DOD computer networks and systems from any unauthorized event whether it be a probe, scan, virus incident, or intrusion. The CNA mission is to coordinate, support and conduct, at the direction of the National Command Authority (NCA), computer network attack operations in support of regional and national objectives.

 

The Task Force headquarters, located in the metropolitan Washington, DC area, is collocated with the Defense Information Systems Agency’s Global Network Operations and Security Center (GNOSC) and the Department of Defense Computer Emergency Response Team (DoD-CERT). 

 

The JTF-CNO components are the Land Information Warfare Activity (LIWA), Marine Forces-Computer Network Defense (MARFOR-CND), Navy Component Task Force-Computer Network Defense (NCTF-CND), Air Force Forces-Computer Network Operations (AFFOR-CNO) and DISA’s DOD Computer Emergency Response Team (DOD CERT).

http://www.iwar.org.uk/cip/resources/ia-hearing-2001-05/01-05-17bryan.htm

 

DoD Cert

http://www.cert.mil/

 

Information Security Associations

 

Internet Engineering Task Force

Jeff Schiller, Security Area Director

SAAG-IETF Security Area Advisory Group

Password: vivienda

http://web.mit.edu/network/ietf/sa/

 

IETF Security Tutorial

http://jis.mit.edu/sectutorial

 

Internet Engineering Task Force

www.ietf.org

 

Internet Mail Consortium

www.imc.org

 

The Internet Security Conference Newsletter

http://www.tisc2002.com/insight.html

 

National Association of State Chief Information Officers

NASCIO has issued a report on IT security titled "Public-Sector Information Security: A Call to Action for Public-Sector CIOs." (See "Final Report" download link below.) It was written for NASCIO by Don Heiman, former Chief Information Technology Officer for the State of Kansas, as part of a grant from the PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment for the Business of Government. http://endowment.pwcglobal.com The report comes out of the November
2001 forum for CIOs held in Washington, DC. Presentations and supporting materials from that forum are available below.
https://www.nascio.org/

 

CIO University

www.ciouniversity.cio.gov

 

CIO Council

www.cio.gov

 

Information Technology Association of America (ITAA)

Shannon Kellogg, VP of Information Security Programs

 

Institute of Internal Auditors, Altamonte Spings, FL

Charles Le Grand, Director of Technology Practices

 

ISC2, Framingham, MA

James Wade, President (Also CSO for Federal Reserve System)

www.isc2.org

 

SANS (System Administration, Networking, and Security)

Alan Paller, Director of Research

Top Twenty Most Critical Internet Security Vulnerabilities. SANS and NIPC compiled this list.

www.sans.org/top20.htm

 

DShield

SANS, a Bethesda, Md., nonprofit educational group for security professionals, is also planning to enlarge its early-warning system called DShield. www.dshield.org  Top Ten list of attacking IP addresses for free online as a public service. DShield could get much bigger soon. Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., the world's dominant firewall maker, plans to provide a feature in its August Firewall 1/VPN 1 product upgrade that will allow customers to block traffic from IP addresses SANS lists as attackers. Customers may also choose to automatically and anonymously submit firewall logs to SANS. Check Point has 100,000 customers and its software sits at 250,000 network gateways world-wide. The Check Point partnership with SANS isn't exclusive and doesn't involve money, according to Asheem Chandna, vice president of business development at the Check Point.

 

ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit and Control (ACM SIGSAC)

http://www.acm.org/sigsac/

 

IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Security and Privacy

http://www.ieee-security.org/

 

The International Association for Cryptologic Research (IACR)

www.iacr.org

 

Computer Security Institute (CSI)

www.gocsi.org

Publishes with FBI “Computer Crime and Security Survey”

CMP Media LLC, publishes Network Magazine and also owns the CSI

 

Internet Security Alliance

Dave McCurdy, Executive Director

www.isalliance.org

The alliance is the joint effort of Carnegie Mellon University's Software Engineering Institute, the institute's CERT Coordination Center and the Electronics Industries Alliance.

 

Research & Consulting Organizations

 

Braxton 

Was Deloitte Consulting (closely held 3.5 billion revenue, 15,000 employees)

Doug McCracken, CEO

Will officially separate from Big Five parent Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

 

Accenture

Was Anderson Consulting (public company)

 

Monday

IBM recently announced will acquire for $3.5 Billion. Was PWC Consulting, was planning to separate itself from

PricewaterhouseCoopers and go public late 2002. 

 

Interpact Inc

Winn Schwartau, President

http://www.interpactinc.com/home.html

Great links from Interpact

http://www.interpactinc.com/infosec.html

 

White Wolf Consulting

http://www.whitewolfconsulting.com

 

Counterpane Internet Security

www.counterpane.com

 

@stake

www.atstake.com

The @stake Sleuth Kit (TASK) is an open source forensic toolkit for a complete analysis of Microsoft and UNIX file systems.
http://www.atstake.com/research/tools/task/

 

www.robertgraham.com

 

ICSA Labs, division of TruSecure Corporation

http://www.icsalabs.com/index.shtml

 

Information Systems for Security Professionals

http://infosyssec.com

 

Packet Storm

www.packetstorm.decepticons.org

Good infosec links.

 

Black Hat Briefings & Training, July 29 - August 1, Las Vegas, the world's premier technical security event! 8 tracks, 12 training sessions, Richard Clarke keynote, 1500 delegates from 30 nations, with a near cult following of both CSOs and "underground" security experts. 
http://www.blackhat.com

 

Security Writers organization

www.securitywriters.org

 

Latin American consulting firm

www.ussrback.com

 

Checksum

www.checksum.org

Good link farm on Info sec topics

 

Security Knowledge Base

http://www.security.ittoolbox.com/

 

Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA)

www.darpa.mil

 

Mitretek Systems (Non-profit research organization to Federal Government)

Developed for the Intelligence Community Starlight and Spire, visual analysis tools

Center for Information Systems

Craig Janus, VP

www.mitre.org

Mitre Intrusion Detection Technology Program

www.mitre.org/research/cyber/security/index.html

The Edge-Information Assurance Issue

www.mitre.org/pubs/edge/february_01/

Mitre Infosec website

www.mitre.org/work/infosec/shtml

CVE

www.mitre.org/pubs/showcase/cve-01/

 

National Research Council

June 25, 2002 report on electrical grid vulnerabilities-commissioned by National Academies

 

ANSER (fed funded research agency)

Ruth David, President

 

Information Security Assessment Training & Rating Program

www.iatrp.com

username: vivienda

password: rancho

 

Aberdeen Group

www.aberdeen.com

Eric Hemmendinger, Research Director in the Information Security Group

 

Robert Francis Group

Chad Robinson, Senior Research Analyst

www.rfgonline.com

 

The Theory Group

www.thetheory.com

 

Gibson Research

Steven Gibson, President

www.grc.com

 

Solutionary, Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP)

http://www.solutionary.com/

 

Foundstone

http://www.foundstone.com/

 

Stroz and Assciates

http://www.strozassociates.com/

 

Attrition.org

www.attrition.org/security/denial

computer security website, host Denial of Service database 2.0

 

Information Week Annual Global Information Security Survey

Fielded by Pricewaterhouse

www.information.week.com/TC/networking/security

 

Computer Economics

Michael Erbschloe, VP Research and author of Information Warfare: How to survive Cyberattacks

 

H2K2 Slides [MS PowerPoint, 2.6 MB]
http://www.iwar.org.uk/hope/h2k2strategic_thought.ppt


Wanja Eric Naef
Webmaster & Principal Researcher
IWS - The Information Warfare Site
http://www.iwar.org.uk

www.nitzbergsecurityassociates.com

 

Information Security Recruiting Firms

 

Tatum CIO Partners LLP

http://www.tatumcio.com/index.htm

 

Presidential Information Security Directives

 

National Strategy for Homeland Security

Information sharing and data mining important components of plan

http://www.whitehouse.gov/homeland/book/

National Plan for Protecting Cyberspace.  On 26 July the Bush administration unveiled the nation's first homeland and cybersecurity strategy, which calls for an unprecedented partnership between federal, state and local governments and the private sector to battle terrorism. The National Plan for Protecting Cyberspace builds upon work started by the Clinton administration to enlist the help of the private sector, which owns and operates the bulk of the nation's critical infrastructure. The new plan calls for the use of a wide array of information technologies to help battle terrorism at home, including the establishment of "smart borders" through the use of IT-enabled sensors and monitoring equipment. It also calls for: port authorities to make use of IT to secure shipping containers entering US ports; biometric authentication systems to secure buildings, airports and other critical infrastructure facilities; the deployment of "red teams" to test the security of critical systems, network and facilities; and an overhaul of IT systems to support better information sharing among federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies.  

 

National Security Directive (NSD)-42 (5 JUL 90)
National Policy for the Security of National Security Telecommunications and Information Systems.

 

Executive Order 13010, Critical Infrastructure Protection, creating the PCCIP

July 15, 1996

 

President’s Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection (PCCIP)

July 1996-October 1997. Chairman: General Robert T. (Tom) Marsh USAF (R)

Remains the definitive public policy review of the business, economic and defense implications of cyber-security risks, vulnerabilities and threats Report Summary, Critical Foundations-Thinking Differently.

http://www.pccip.gov/summary.html

Presidential Decision Directive PDD-63 (22 MAY 98)

http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/pdd-63.htm

Plan of action on the findings of the President’s Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection (PCCIP) of Oct 97. Requires Vulnerability Awareness and Education Programs within both the Government and private sector to sensitize people regarding the importance of security and train them to security standards, particularly regarding cyber systems.

 

President's Critical Infrastructure Protection Board (PCIPB)

www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb

Chairman, Richard Clarke

Vice Chairman, Howard Schmidt

The CNSS reports fully and regularly on its activities to the PCIPB.

 

National Security Telecommunications & Information Systems Security Policy 11 (NSTISSP 11)

-use Common Criteria by 1 July 2002

-House version of Defense Authorization Bill 2003 requires DoD to buy certified products

 

DOD Information Assurance Directorate

Michael Jacobs, Director

www.nsa.gov/isso

 

IAD Sponsored events

http://www.iaevents.com/

 

Executive Order 13231 - Critical Infrastructure Protection in the Information Age, 16 OCT 2001

http://www.ciao.gov/News/EOonCriticalInfrastrutureProtection101601.html

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/10/20011016-12.html

Created the President’s Critical Infrastructure Protection Board (PCIPB)

Information Sharing and Analysis Centers (ASIC) to pool information about cyber threats. Only Four ISAC currently, were created in Banking, Telecommunications, electric Power, emergency law enforcement and Information Technology.

 

IT-ISAC

www.itisac.org

 

Financial services (FS-ISAC), Mr. Stanley (Stash) R. Jarocki, Chairman

NIPC and Financial Services ISAC agree to share security information. In an effort to enhance the security and readiness of the country's financial services industries to deal with potential terrorist threats, Mr. Stanley (Stash) R. Jarocki, Chairman, Financial Services Information Sharing and Analysis Center, LLC (FS/ISAC) signed an agreement with Ronald L. Dick, NIPC Director. The partnership between the FS/ISAC and the NIPC will allow vital security-related information to move more effectively between the multi-agency NIPC, based at FBI headquarters in Washington, DC, and financial services associations. 

www.fsisac.com

 

Chemical Sector Cyber Security Information Sharing Forum

David Kepler, CIO, Dow Chemical Corporation

 

Water supply, and telecommunications (NCC-ISAC)

           

North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC)—the ISAC for the electric power sector-have established an indications, analysis and warning program (IAW) program

 

The proposal for an interstate information sharing and analysis center (ISAC) for cybersecurity, put forward by the National Association of State Chief Information Officers (NASCIO), stems from Presidential Decision Directive 63 issued by President Clinton in 1998. This may be the same initiative as the Cyber Security Information Sharing Network.

 

 

Critical Infrastructure Assurance Office (CIAO), created by PDD-63

National Infrastructure Protection Center (NIPC), created by PDD-63

February 1998. National Cyber Warning Center, under the department of Justice housed within the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). All 56 Field offices have an Infragard chapter. The NIPC has developed the InfraGard initiative into the largest government/private sector joint partnership for infrastructure protection in the world. We have taken it from its humble roots of a few dozen members in just two states to its current membership of over 4,400 partners. It is the most extensive government-private sector partnership for infrastructure protection in the world. InfraGard (with the private sector infrastructure owners and operators) shares information about cyber intrusions and other critical infrastructure vulnerabilities. This service is provided free of charge.

 

NIPC offers "Seven Simple Computer  Security Tips"

http://www.nipc.gov/warnings/computertips.htm

 

US Space Command (SPACECOM) Joint Task Force/Computer Network Operations (JTF/CNO)

 

National Security Presidential Directive (NSPD 1)

Currently working on EO to implement (NSPD 1)

 

NCIX

www.ncix.gov

 

Committee on National  Security Systems (CNSS) formerly NSTISSC

John Stenbit, Chairman, Assistant Secretary of Defense for Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence. CNSS is the new name for National Security Telecommunications & Information Systems Security Committee (NSTISSC)

www.nstissc.gov

 

Under Executive Order (E.O.) 13231 of October 16, 2001, Critical Infrastructure Protection in the Information Age, the President redesignated the National Security Telecommunications and Information Systems Security Committee (NSTISSC) as the Committee on National Security Systems (CNSS). The Department of Defense continues to chair the committee under the authorities established by NSD-42. As a standing committee of the President's Critical Infrastructure Protection Board, the CNSS reports fully and regularly on its activities to the Board.

 

The EO directs the protection of information systems for critical infrastructure, including emergency preparedness communications, and the physical assets that support such systems. The Secretary of Defense and the Director of Central Intelligence are responsible for developing and overseeing the implementation of government-wide policies, principles, standards, and guidelines for the security of systems with national security information.

 

The CNSS provides a forum for the discussion of policy issues, sets national policy, and promulgates direction, operational procedures, and guidance for the security of national security systems through the CNSS Issuance System. National security systems contain classified information or:

       a. involves intelligence activities;

       b. involves cryptographic activities related to national security;

       c. involves command and control of military forces;

       d. involves equipment that is an integral part of a weapon or weapons

           system(s); or

       e. is critical to the direct fulfillment of military or intelligence missions (not

           including routine administrative and business applications).

 

National Information Assurance Partnership

Ron Ross, Director

Partnership between NIST and NSA to implement Common Criteria

Developing “Protection Profiles” for each technology area-Basic, extended and Advanced

Trusted Computer Security Evaluation Criteria (TCSEC) “Orange Book”

http://niap.nist.gov

 

Security Proof of Concept Keystone Program (SPOCK Program)

http://coact.com/spock.html

SPOCK is a joint government-industry consortium sponsored by NSA to demonstrate security features of commercial and government products that can support dependable security architectures. This activity provides a forum for government users and security technology providers to share information on security requirements, emerging technologies, and new product developments. Integrators and product developers are afforded opportunities to share new solutions, identify government developed technology available for commercial use, and prototype COTS products in government sponsored test beds.

John H. McIver, Jr
NSA SPOCK Program Manager
410-854-6318
jhmcive@missi.ncsc.mil

 

Larry McGinness
COACT, Inc. SPOCK Support
301-498-0150
lbm@coact.com

 

ICAT Metabase Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures Database

http://icat.nist.gov/icat.cfm

ICAT is a searchable vulnerability index available at http://icat.nist.gov and maintained by the Computer Security Division at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. ICAT enables one to search, at a fine granularity (e.g. by software, version number, and other attributes), a set of vulnerabilities standardized and verified by the members of the computer security community involved with the CVE vulnerability naming standard http://cve.mitre.org Once a vulnerability is isolated, ICAT provides a snapshot of the vulnerability and links to the appropriate entries in public vulnerability databases. These public databases then provide ICAT users with detailed vulnerability and patch information. ICAT is a fine grained search engine that allows one to search and access the contents of some of the best public vulnerability databases on the web. ICAT can help system administrators, researchers, and security officers to stay abreast of the ever changing world of vulnerabilities.

 

National Computer Security Center

http://csrc.nist.gov/nissc

 

National Security Council

www.whitehouse.gov/nsc

 

Stay Safe Online

www.staysafeonline.info

 

Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA)

www.disa.mil

 

US Air Force Information Security

 

Air Force Office of Special Investigations Computer Crime Investigations and Information Operations

http://www.dtic.mil/afosi

 

US Navy Information Security

https://infosec.navy.mil/

 

US Army Information Security

Vermont National Guard

RESERVE COMPONENT IO SUPPORT

The multi-component concept of operations for the LIWA includes reserve component support to expand the LIWA's capability to support Army total IO requirements across the entire operational spectrum especially defensive IO emphasizing information infrastructure protection. Both the Army National Guard (through the IO Project Office) and the Army Reserve (through the Reserve IO Coordination Center - RIOCC) are organized and trained to provide a structure to complement and reinforce the LIWA's IO operational capabilities. Both reserve components provide direct IO support to operational and tactical commanders to achieve full spectrum dominance, expanding the Army's capability to perform IO across the operational continuum. Additionally, ARNG IO organizations also support Homeland Defense and state applications of defensive IO in the form of computer emergency response and vulnerability assessment. Another purpose of the integrated multi-component support strategy is to contribute to the readiness of the entire Army by providing an IO capability using the soldier's civilian acquired skills. 

Reserve Information Warfare Enhancement Center (RIOCC)

www.vimare.com/RIOCC.html

 

Defense chief outlines challenges of information age warfare

http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0802/081602td1.htm

Army Strategic Readiness System - replaces the USR   https://akocomm.us.army.mil/srs/ 

AR 520-20, Information Warfare/Command and Control Warfare Policy, established LIWA to support and integrate IO in Army operations.

 

AR 380-19, Information Systems Security

http://www.gordon.army.mil/sit/ar380-19.doc

 

AR 380-5, US Army Information Security Program

 

AR 380-53, Penetration testing and security testing attempting to circumvent security features

 

FM 3-13 (Formerly FM 100-6), US Army Information Operations

Scheduled to be published in 3rd Qtr 2002. FM 3-13 is the Army's overarching publication for information operations (IO) and builds on the foundation laid in Chapter 11, "Information Superiority, of FM 3.0

 

AR 381-14 (S), TEMPEST and communications security

 

Information Operations in the US Army Reserve

http://www.usarc.army.mil/news/IOPromo.htm

 

US Army Land Information Warfare Activity (LIWA)

8825 Beulah Street, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-5246

https://www.liwa.belvoir.army.mil/

Great links from LIWA

https://www.liwa.belvoir.army.mil/io_websites.html

Army's Computer Response Team assumes electronic border protection duties

by Master Sgt. Joan Fischer

FORT BELVOIR, Va. (ARNEWS, May 12, 1997) -- Information dominance took a giant leap into the future in March when the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command opened the Army Computer Emergency Response Team Coordination Center at Fort Belvoir, Va. Its mission is to re-write the books on how the Army handles the newest threat in the field manuals -- computer hackers.The team, also known as ACERT/CC, is the newest division formed under the two-year old Land Information Warfare Activity led by Col. Halbert F. Stevens. It's chartered with the responsibility to detect, track and report computer attacks against Army computer networks.

 

LIWA received the tasker in February 1996 to form the response team. A year later, under the guidance of INSCOM Commander Brig. Gen. John. D. Thomas Jr., the command was ready to take on command and control protect (C2

protect) operations in support of the Army. "It's an element whose time has come," said Lt. Gen. (Ret.) Paul E. Menoher Jr., former deputy chief of staff for intelligence. "C2 protection of information assurance is absolutely critical."

Future plans include regional computer emergency response teams, called RCERTs, which will be located around the world. One regional team is already operational in Europe. ACERT/CC is currently operational Monday through Friday, 12-hours a day. Eventually, it will be operational 24-hours a day.

 

ACERT/CC is a joint venture among the information operations triad of the Army's deputy chiefs of staff for Operations and Intelligence, and the Joint Chief of Staff's director for Command, Control, Communications and Computers (DISC4).

The ACCERT/CC role is two-fold: help the Army identify computer systems vulnerabilities, and prevent hackers from accessing those same systems by exploiting those vulnerabilities. Set up to operate under the INSCOM umbrella, ACERT/CC receives missions from DA, DCSOPS and assistance requests from any Army command. According to Lt. Col. Bob Vrtis, LIWA's chief of information assurance, ACERT/CC prioritizes the incoming requests for assistance, however the Army's deputy chief of staff for operations can direct their priorities.

 

A hacker demonstration was conducted as part of the ribbon-cutting ceremony. An ACERT/CC computer security expert conducted the demonstration, saying that you have to "think like a hacker and try to break into a system."

For example, if an Army organization requests the team's assistance in checking out its vulnerabilities, a team member can sit at a computer terminal and attempt to break in from the remote site -- much like a real-world hacker. The goal is to get access to the "target" and gain system administrator's privileges, then erase all electronic record of the contact. In the case of a malicious hacker, the goal might be to alter files, delete information, or replace an Internet web site. While the team can diagnose such vulnerabilities long-range, Vrtis said you lose a lot by this process. "What you miss is the hands-on approach of providing personal attention and training to the systems administrator," he said. ACERT/CC sends out forward support teams to various sites on request. ACERT/CC is also the first-line of defense in tracking down computer hackers, whether teenage hackers trying out their skills on military targets, or people attempting espionage. ACERT/CC's main thrust is to deter outside intrusion into the Army's systems. "Deter is the key piece and focus of what ACERT/CC is all about," said Stevens.

Whatever else it is, ACERT/CC is not a police activity. Stevens said ACERT/CC's role is to determine if there is a hacker, then use the established notification process to report and coordinate responses, such as in the case of any other potential crime.

 

Barbara Schalestock, ACERT/CC chief, said that, depending upon the incident, it could be reported to Criminal Investigation Command or other appropriate Army activity. She has been involved in writing those reporting procedures while forming ACERT/CC's nucleus. Schalestock visited other agencies, including the Navy and Air Force, both of which had previously formed emergency response teams to address computer security issues. She was able to draw from the other services' experiences, along with DISA, to focus the ACERT/CC mission. She said the groundwork is established for getting operational procedures in place and formalized. The ACERT/CC staffing is another on-going challenge. ACERT/CC is currently staffed with a mix of contractors, Department of the Army civilians and military. Stevens said that resources are being reallocated from existing entities within the Department of Defense, which will enable the ACERT/CC to grow to its target strength of about 20 people.

 

Educating the rest of the Army about a new system or organization is part of the evolution process. Plans call for a web site on the Army homepage featuring information about ACERT/CC services. Vrtis said they intend to be proactive on notifying their "customers" about vulnerabilities by forming a service database and e-mail notices to consumers. The team will also provide LAN managers with the software tools they need to combat attacks. Rapidly changing capabilities further blur areas of responsibilities among the various agencies in a joint environment. ACERT/CC provides valuable support to the operational side of the military. Stevens said ACERT/CC's primary focus is to support the land component commander. In these days of joint missions, he added that it is difficult to draw the line for areas of responsibilities. "It depends on who gets tasked with the mission," said Stevens. "If the Army gets the lead, then (they will) coordinate with the other players."

Many decisions are yet to be made. Meanwhile, Vrtis and Schalestock are charged with forging ahead -- drawing a road map to the future. "We play it by ear," Schalestock simply said. "There's no (predetermined) path to take."

(Editor's note: To contact the Army Computer Emergency Response Team Coordination Center, call 1-888-203-6332 toll free from the United States or DSN 312-235-1113 from overseas military phones. For more information, call INSCOM Public Affairs Office at COML (703) 806-5326. Fischer is with the INSCOM Public Affairs Office, Fort Belvoir, Va.)

Information Warfare Associates (private firm)

www.ewa.com

 

US Army Research Laboratory – History of Computing, ENIAC supported US Army operations

http://ftp.arl.army.mil/~mike/comphist/

 

Theater Network Operations and Security Center

http://www.ansoc.army.mil/

CONUS-TNOSC is a part of the United States Army Signal Command which is located at Ft. Huachuca, Arizona. CONUS-TNOSC consists of dedicated teams providing system, network and database management support to U.S. Army customers in support of the Army Power Projection missions on a worldwide basis.

 

The Office of the Director of Information Systems for Command, Control, Communications and Computers (DISC4) http://www.army.mil/disc4/ is now Office of the Chief Information Officer/G-6 (CIO/G-6)
http://www.army.mil/ciog6/

 

Army Information Assurance

https://informationassurance.us.army.mil/

The Information Assurance Directorate is responsible for developing and overseeing the Army's Information Systems Security Program (ISSP) which is the overarching program for securing the Army's portion of the Defense Information Infrastructure. The Army's Chief Information Officer/G-6 is responsible for implementing protective measures, developing plans, policies and procedures, developing and monitoring training, and validating requirements to protect SECRET and below command, control, communications, and computer capabilities. The Information Assurance Directorate develops and directs the implementation of the ISSP for product procurement, the Network Security Improvement Program (NSIP) Plan for the Army sustaining base, and the Force XXI Protection Plan for the tactical force.

 

DoD Information Assurance Directorate

www.nsa.gov/isso

 

Information Assurance Technology Analysis Center

Good infosec links on resource page.

http://iac.dtic.mil/iatac

 

Information Assurance Technical Framework Forum

www.iatf.net

 

National Information Assurance Partnership

http://niap.nist.gov

 

Systems Security Engineering - Capability Maturity Model

http://www.sse-cmm.org/

 

Information Assurance Support Element

http://mattche.iiie.disa.mil/

 

Army Computer Emergency Response Team

http://www.acert.belvoir.army.mil/

 

Orange Book DoDD 5200.28

http://www.acert.belvoir.army.mil/regulations/dod5200

 

Automated System Security Incident Response Team

http://www.assist.mil/

 

CERT Security Improvement Modules

http://www.cert.org/security-improvement

 

Computer Incident Advisory Capability

http://ciac.llnl.gov/

 

DOE Information Security (DOE-IS)

http://doe-is.llnl.gov/

 

Director of Information Management (DOIM)

http://doim.army.mil

 

INFOSEC Program Management Office

http://www.disa.mil/infosec

 

U.S. Army Regional Computer Emergency Response Team Europe (RCERT-E)

http://www.iwsc.5sigcmd.army.mil/

 

Site Security Guidance

 

Site Security Handbook

http://www.net.ohio-state.edu/hypertext/rfc1244/toc.html

This handbook is a guide to setting computer security policies and procedures for sites that have systems on the Internet. This guide lists issues and factors that a site must consider when setting their own policies. It makes some recommendations and gives discussions of relevant areas. This guide is only a framework for setting security policies and procedures. In order to have an effective set of policies and procedures, a site will have to make many decisions, gain agreement, and then communicate and implement the policies.

 

Security & Encryption

http://www.yahoo.com/Computers_and_Internet/Security_and_Encryption

 

List of homepages of leading cryptographers including Ross Anderson, University of Cambridge and Dorothy Denning, Georgetown University

http://www.swcp.com/~mccurley/cryptographers/cryptographers.html

 

Jan Camenisch http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~jca/  

list of Crytographers http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~jca/cryptographers/

 

SIRENE: SIcherheit in REchnerNEtzen / Security in Computer Networks

http://www.semper.org/sirene/index.html

 

Zurich Information Security Center

http://www.zisc.ethz.ch/

 

Joint Interoperability Test Command (JITC) (Part of DISA) JITC is located at the Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) Indian Head, Md.

 

Security Technical Implementation Guide (STIG)

STIG certification is granted to only the most comprehensive and reliable security management solutions and enables government agencies to select and utilize these certified products to help secure their IT infrastructure.

 

Federal Energy Regulation Commission (FERC)

 

Office of Science & Technology Policy (OSTP)

 

House Science Committee

Sherwood Boehlert (R-NY), Chairman

 

Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Science, Technology and Space

Ron Wyden, Chairman

 

UNIRAS is a member of the Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams (FIRST)

and has contacts with other international Incident Response Teams (IRTs) in order to foster cooperation and coordination in incident prevention, to prompt  rapid reaction to incidents, and to promote information sharing amongst its members and the community at large.

 

UNIRAS (UK Govt CERT) Briefing Notice - 187/02 dated 20.06.02  Time: 11:30

 UNIRAS is part of NISCC(National Infrastructure Security Co-ordination Centre)

- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  UNIRAS material is also available from its website at www.uniras.gov.uk and

         Information about NISCC is available from www.niscc.gov.uk

 

Upcoming Information Security and Assurance events:

 

http://iac.dtic.mil/iatac/news_events/training_2002_main.htm
http://call.army.mil/Io/liwa/20may02.htm

 

 

University Information Security Centers and Research Institutes

 

The Federal Cyber Service program offers scholarships to study information assurance in exchange for two years of government service. The University of Tulsa, Carnegie Mellon University, the Naval Postgraduate University, Iowa State University, the University of Idaho, and Purdue University currently participate and have programs for both graduate and undergraduate students. The first group of 66 students is finishing the first year of the program.

 

National Colloquium for Information Systems Security Education

www.ncisse.org

 

NSA Centers of Academic Excellence in Information Assurance Education

http://www.nsa.gov/isso/programs/coeiae/index.htm

 

National INFOSEC Education and Training Program

http://www.nsa.gov/isso/programs/nietp/index.htm

 

DOD Information Assurance Scholarship Program

http://www.c3i.osd.mil/iasp/

 

National Security Telecommunications and Information Systems Security Committee:

http://www.nstissc.gov

 

James Madison University

Center for Research in Information Systems Security Education (CRISSE)

www.infosec.jmu.edu/ncisse/conference99

Manages the NCISSE as chairmanship changes each year amongst academic, industry and government.

 

US Army Signal Center, School of Information Technology

http://www.gordon.army.mil/sit/

http://atzhssweb.gordon.army.mil/otdweb/information/contents.asp

 

Dartmouth

Institute for Security Technology Studies

Michael Vatis, Director

www.ists.dartmouth.edu

 

Dartmouth

The Institute for Information Infrastructure Protection

http://www.thei3p.org/index.jsp

Great Links from I3P

http://www.thei3p.org/ecommunities/links.jsp

 

Dartmouth

Investigative Research into Infrastructure Assurance (IRIA) group

http://www.ists.dartmouth.edu/IRIA/courses/index.htm

 

Georgetown University

Institute for Information Assurance

Dorothy Denning, Director

http://www.cosc.georgetown.edu/~denning/

 

Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute

Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT) Coordination Center

www.cert.org

 

Navy War College, Newport, RI

Knowledge Management Team

2001 Global War Games – eliminated stove-piped chains of command

John Hopkins University

Information Security Institute

www.jhuisi.jhu.edu

 

KSU Center for Info Security Education & Awareness

http://infosec.kennesaw.edu

http://infosec.kennesaw.edu/link2.html

 

Southeast Crime Institute

http://cybercrime.kennesaw.edu

 

University of New Haven

Forensic Computer Investigation Program

http://unhca.com/index.html

 

University of Washington

Dave Dittrich, Senior Research Engineer

http://staff.washington.edu/dittrich/misc/ddos

Largest collection of links relating to DDOS attacks on the Internet

 

Purdue University

Center for Education and Research in Information Assurance and Security

Gene Spafford, Director

http://www.cerias.purdue.edu/homes/spaf/index.html

www.cerias.purdue.edu

 

United States Military Academy

Information Technology and Operations Center

http://www.itoc.usma.edu/

 

Norwich University

Mich Kabay, Associate Professor of Information Assurance

www.norwich.edu

 

University of Maryland, Baltimore County

Center for Information Security and Assurance

www.cisa.umbc.edu

 

National Defense University

Security and Information Assurance

www.nduknowledge.net

 

Carnegie Mellon University

Center for Computer and Communications Security (C3S)

http://www.ece.cmu.edu/c3s/index.html

 

University of California-Davis, Department of Computer Science

Computer Security Laboratory

http://seclab.cs.ucdavis.edu

 

George Mason University

Laboratory for Information Security Technology

www.list.gmu.edu

 

George Mason University

Center for Secure Information Systems

www.isse.gmu.edu/~csis

 

Idaho State University

Information Security Resources

http://security.isu.edu

 

University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory

Ross Anderson, author of Security Engineering

http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/rja14/

 

University of Cambridge

Computer Security Group, Computer Laboratory

http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/Security/index.html

Ross Anderson, author of Security Engineering

http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/rja14/

 

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

The Center for Cryptography, Computer and Network Security (CCCNS)

http://www.cccns.uwm.edu/

 

London School of Economics

Computer Security Research Center

http://csrc.lse.ac.uk

 

Queensland University of Technology

Information Security Research Centre

http://www.fit.qut.edu.au/DataComms/Research/ISRC/ISRC.html

 

University Information Security Courses

 

http://www.iwar.org.uk/comsec/resources/security-lecture/index.html

Recommended Textbooks for course:

Computer Security, Dieter Gollmann, J. Wiley & Sons.

Network Security Essentials, William Stallings, Prentice Hall

Secrets and Lies, Bruce Schneier, J. Wiley and Sons.

Security Engineering, Ross Anderson. J. Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0 471 38922 6

 

James Madison University

MS in Computer Science with concentration in Information Security

http://www.infosec.jmu.edu/program/html/program.htm

 

University of Miami

Michael Froomkin, Professor of Lay, E-commerce cyberspace expert

http://personal.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/

 

University of Tulsa

Police, students combat cybercrime.  In an unusual arrangement, Tulsa, OK police are teaming up with students at the University of Tulsa to help investigate and stop cybercrime.  Under the agreement, computer science students will work
with the Tulsa police to help them investigate child pornography, fraud and forgery, identity theft and other crimes committed via computers, said Detective Scott Wanzer of the Cyber Crimes Unit. The student interns gain real-world experience by learning what a forensic investigator does, and the officers gain expertise in new software tools, research and techniques. President Bush wants people to help protect the nation against cyberattacks, but there is not enough money or people to go around, said Sujeet Shenoi, computer science professor at the University of Tulsa. 

University of Auckland

Peter Gutmann

http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/

 

Cornell University

 

University of Tennessee

Tom Dunigan Security Page

http://www.epm.ornl.gov/~dunigan/security.html

 

Georgetown University

Dorothy Denning website

http://www.cosc.georgetown.edu/~denning/

 

MIT

Ron Rivest

http://theory.lcs.mit.edu/~rivest/

http://theory.lcs.mit.edu/~rivest/crypto-security.html

 

University of California, Berkeley

David Wagner, Assistant Professor, specializes in information security

http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~daw/

Capitol College

www.capitol-college.edu

MS in Network Security

 

Key Government and Corporate CIO and CSO

 

Intelligence Community

John Dahms, CIO for Intelligence Community

 

General Services Administration (GSA) 

Sallie McDonald, assistant commissioner for the office of information assurance and critical infrastructure protection

Analyzes data from agencies' intrusion-detection systems, firewalls and security-incident logs. Intends to develop early warning system in cooperation with the CERT Coordination Center, a federally funded research group in Pittsburgh operated by Carnegie Mellon University.

 

Department of Commerce-Office of the CIO

Tom Pyke, CIO

http://www.osec.doc.gov/cio/

 

Department of Defense

John Stenbit, Assistant Secretary of Defense for Command, Control. Communications and Intelligence (C3I)

 

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)

Darwin John, CIO

Was CIO for the Mormon church

 

Office of Management & Budget

Mark Forman, CIO

 

Office of Homeland Security

Steven Cooper, CIO and Senior Director for Information Integration

 

Government Accounting Office

Robert Dacey, Director of Information Security

 

National Security Agency

Daniel Wolf, Information Assurance Director

 

US Army

LTG Robert W. Noonan Jr., the Army G-2,

MG. Steven W. Boutelle, Director of Information Operations, Networks and Space, CIO/G-6

 

US Air Force

John Gilligan, CIO

 

US Navy

Alex Bennet, Deputy CIO for Enterprise Integration

 

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

Ron Miller, CIO 

Steven Schmidt, Chief Security Officer

 

NASA, Washington, DC

Lee Holcomb, CIO

 

Federal Reserve System

James Wade, Chief Security Officer

 

Harris Corporation

Bill Wall, Chief Security Engineer

 

Staples

Paul Gaffney, CIO

 

VISA, Tampa, FL

John Shaughnessy, Sr VP of Risk Management

Cardholder Information Security Program

http://usa.visa.com/business/merchants/cisp_how_to_comply.html

Oracle

Mary Ann Davidson, Chief Security Officer

 

Information Security Vendors

 

Hewlett Packard

http://www.hp.com/security/

 

Zone Labs

www.zonelabs.com

Personal firewall downloaded from the Internet

 

Bindview Corporation

www.bindview.com

Worlds leader in Host bases vulnerability assessment

Scott Blake, VP for Information Security

 

Microsoft

www.microsoft.com/security

 

Bindview RAZOR Team

http://razor.bindview.com

Scott Blake,  Head of Bindview RAZOR team

 

Deployed as ISP level, expert systems examine network traffic against baseline of normal activity

Arbor Networks

www.arbor.com

Peakflow

 

Asta Networks

www.astanetworks.com

Vantage System

 

Captus Networks

www.captus.com

 

Mazu Networks

www.mazunetworks.com

Traffic Master

 

Vigilinx, Parsippany, NJ

Bruce Murphy, Chief Executive Officer   Parsippany, NJ

Attack intelligence services based on information gleaned from underground hacker sites and chat rooms and other public sources. Competes with SecurityFocus and SANS Institute for deep threat warning systems.

 

Veritas Software Corporation

350 Ellis Street

Mountain View, VA 94043

Backup solutions

www.veritas.com

 

Silent Runner

10700 Parkridge Blvd, #400

Reston, VA 20191

800-842-2366

John Suit, CTO

www.silentrunner.com

 

McAfee Security

McAfee Virusscan ASaP is backed by AVERT (Anti-Virus Emergency Response Team). Large number of McAfee stock owned by Network Associates.

www.mcafeesecurity.com

 

IBM

http://www-3.ibm.com/security/index.shtml

 

Advanced Control Systems, Inc. is an expert developer and supplier of information management systems, including SCADA, distribution  management, energy     management and substation automation systems. Established in 1975, the company has commissioned more than 500 systems worldwide. The company is based in Norcross, Georgia, with offices in Texas and California, and agents throughout the world.

www.acsatlanta.com

 

Secure Network Operations

Security-services firm better known as Sno-Soft. HP threatened with legal action for disclosing serious flaw in Tru64 Unix operating system, which HP acquired with the Compaq acquisition.

 

eEye Digital Security

Make Retina and other security products. Have CHO, chief hacking officer.

 

VMWare

Allows multiple operating systems to run simultaneously

Foundstone

www.foundstone.com

Hacking exposed book, firm dedicated to Penetration Testing.

 

Hacking Groups

 

Hacktivismo

Oxblood Ruffin, Founder

Hacktivismo is a group of international hackers, human rights workers, artists and others who seek to further the goals of human rights through technology. They operate under the aegis of the CULT OF THE DEAD COW (cDc). Hacktivismo is committed to developing technologies in support of the highest standards of

human rights. For more information, please visit www.hacktivismo.com

 

Cult of the Dead Cow

Based in Lubbock, Texas, the CULT OF THE DEAD COW (cDc) is the most influential hacking group in the world. The cDc alumni reads like a Who’s Who of hacking and includes a former Presidential advisor on Internet security, among others. The group is further distinguished by publishing the longest running e-zine on the Internet [est. 1984], stretching the limits of the First Amendment, and fighting anyone or any government that aspires to limit free speech.

http://cultdeadcow.com/

 

2600 Magazine and www.h2k2.net

The three-day conference known as H2K2 -- short for Hackers 2002 -- was organized by the publishers of 2600, a magazine sold in suburban bookstores that celebrates the culture of computer hacking. To preserve anonymity and draw the largest crowd, no names are taken at registration.

www.h2k2.net

 

Information Security Tools

Great paper on Penetration Testing-as Published on SANS

www.vimare.com/PenetrationStudies.html

 

Top 50 Info Security tool by Fyodor, author of nmap

http://www.insecure.org/tools.html

http://www.insecure.org/links.html

 

Navy Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren Lab – Information Assurance Office

Government, Vendor and Blackhat hacker links

http://www.nswc.navy.mil/ISSEC/link.html

 

Security tool by @stake

http://www.atstake.com/research/tools/index.html

 

FedCirc Security Tools

www.vimare.com/Fedcirctools.htm

 

CERT Coordination Center list of Tools

 

DoD CERT On-line

http://www.cert.mil/resources/security_tools.htm

 

www.zdnet.com

 

www.netstumbler.com

Map of vulnerable Wireless access points.

   

Trinux
http://trinux.sourceforge.net

Trinux is a good command based Linux operating system that comes on a floppy disk and installs itself into RAM with a RAM Drive. Trinux brings together a comprehensive list of command line based security tools built around a Linux operating system. 
You can also download extra modules that can be downloaded on each boot from the Trinux website and installed into RAM for the current session. An ideal solution if you need to move around to multiple offices, prefer a command line interface over a GUI interface and would prefer that you have everything configured for you or if you want to run on a low specification computer. 

Redhat 7.2 Enimga Linux
http://www.redhat.com

RedHat if installed from CD or DVD and is very easy to install for the Linux novice and will give you a guided GUI setup program and will have you up and running with a KDE or GNOME X-Windows interface very quickly. If you are a Linux novice, then this would be a good Linux operating system to choose and contains lots of built in help systems and help forums that are available on the internet. Most security tools are available pre-compiled for RedHat so you won’t have to get your hands dirty in re-compiling Unix source code and libraries. You will need a Linux platform to install some of the Linux based security tools.

 

Steganography

http://steganography.tripod.com/stego/software.html

 

Camera/Shy, a browser-based steganography application fromHACKTIVISMO. It allows users to trade in banned content across the Internet. Camera/Shy is the debut release from Hacktivismo, a special operations group sponsored by the CULT OF THE DEAD COW. Camera/Shy will be released open source under the GNU General Public License. Camera/Shy’s "one touch" encryption process delivers banned content across the Internet in seconds. Utilizing LSB steganographic techniques and AES-256 bit encryption, hiding content in plain view as ordinary gif images. Camera/Shy is the only steganographic tool that automatically scans for and delivers decrypted content straight from the Web. Standalone, Internet Explorer-based browser that leaves no trace on the user’s system. As a safety feature Camera/Shy also includes security switches for protection against malicious HTML.

· Automatic invisible cache and history clearing built in, your browsing experience is invisible

· Automatic scanning of Web pages for stegged and encrypted gif files

· One click Web page encoding into gif functionality

· One click parsing of hidden content functionality

· All content scanned and parsed is down from the local cache, no double grabbing of content

· Automatic Rijandael encryption of all steganographic content

· Least Significant Byte Pixel insertion steganography

· Relative links that would be broken are made into static links in Web site encrypting process

· High and moderate security browsing settings that include:

Optionally killing all activescripting including DHTML behaviors

    · Optionally killing all Java and ActiveX

    · Optionally disabling client pull in cases where you want to ensure the content comes from the server or local cache you are browsing

· Standalone executable file, no installer

· GIF to and from BMP and JPEG to and from BMP utilities built in for easy gif

content selection

 

Zombie Installation Tools

 

Trinoo

Stacheldraht

 

Encryption Algorithms and Tools

PGP

http://www.pgpi.org/products/pgp/versions/freeware/

 

RSA

http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/txt/rsa.html

IDEA  

DES

Is a block cipher. Operates on a single chunk of data at a time encrypting 64 bits (8 bytes) of plaintext to produce 64 bits of ciphertext, key length is 56 bits often expressed as an 8 character string with the extra bits used as a parity check. DES Algorithm has 19 distinct stages

 

DES Cipher Feedback Mode

Steam cipher-treats the plaintext as a continuous stream of information. Ciphertext produced depends on the entire history of the stream. Both sender and receiver operate their DES chips in encryption mode.

 

 

Triple DES

Three 56 bit DES keys used an input to an array of 3 DES chips (or software blocks). Pattern is used for the encryption step is encrypt-decrypt-encrypt (EDE) with a DED pattern used to reverse process.

 

IDEA

Block cipher, uses secret key symmetric encryption, uses 128 bit key to operate on 64 bit plaintext blocks. Same algorithm used for both encryption and decryption. Consists of 8 iterations

 

RC2

64 bit block cipher with a variable length key

 

RC4

uses a variable length key, operates as a stream cipher

 

RC5

Totally parametrized system, can change block size, key length, and the number of rounds, basic algorithm is a blockcipher, stream version can also be defined

  

Virus Hoaxes

 

Rob Rosenberger's Virus Myths website is always an outstanding source of  information. 

George Smith  70743.1711@compuserve.com is Editor-at-Large for VMYTHS and founder of the Crypt Newsletter. He has written extensively on viruses, the genesis of techno-legends and the impact of both on society. His work has appeared in publications as diverse as the Wall Street Journal, the Village Voice and the National Academy of Science's Issues in Science & Technology, among others.

 

A-Z list of computer virus hoaxes

http://Vmyths.com/hoax.cfm

How to spot a hoax computer virus alert

http://Vmyths.com/resource.cfm?id=19&page=1

Reduce virus hoaxes inside your company

http://Vmyths.com/resource.cfm?id=20&page=1

www.Vmyths.com

 

 

Alternatives to BugTrack:

Full Disclosure
http://lists.netsys.com/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure

Vulnwatch
http://www.vulnwatch.org/subscribe.html

Detecting and Removing Malicious Code - Security Focus
http://online.securityfocus.com/infocus/1610

Firewalls

 

Windows ICF (Internet Connection Firewall)

http://online.securityfocus.com/infocus/1620

 

 

 

Worms and Virii

 

Melissa March 1999

http://www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/1999/FCW_041299_294.asp

 

ILOVEYOU April 2000

http://www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/2000/0501/web-love2-05-04-00.asp

 

 

Code Red- July 2001- Port scanning is a level of noise that many sites must endure. The tools are readily available and interest runs high in so-called "script kiddies" who run the tools for reasons ranging from curiosity to malice. However, in July 2001, scanning reached a new level. The Code Red worm quickly traversed the Internet, infecting hundreds of thousands of systems. The worm would scan random IP addresses for port 80. On successful location of a server, the worm would try to exploit the .IDA buffer overflow weakness of Microsoft’s IIS web servers. Upon successful exploitation, the worm would start 100 threads on that victim server, looking for additional victims. The infection mushroomed quickly, as administrators scrambled to apply the Microsoft fix which had been announced almost a month before the worm appeared. U.S. officials also believe it is possible that a foreign government helped create the Code Red virus that took control of 314,000 servers in July 2001 and directed them to attack White House computers.

 

Nimba debuted 17 Sept 2002.

 

Network Mapping and Port Scanning

 

Nmap ("Network Mapper") is an open source utility for network exploration or security auditing. It was designed to rapidly scan large networks, although it works fine against single hosts. Nmap uses raw IP packets in novel ways to determine what hosts are available on the network, what services (ports) they are offering, what operating system (and OS version) they are running, what type of packet filters/firewalls are in use, and dozens of other characteristics. Nmap runs on most types of computers, and both console and graphical versions are available. Nmap is free software, available with full source code under the terms of the GNU GPL.

http://www.insecure.org/nmap/index.html

 

Xprobe

Like Nmap - discovers operating system. Doesn't work through firewalls.

 

WinPcap 2.3

Remote install, local install, command prompt you can install from, can install without access to Windows GUI.

 

VNC Virtual Network Computer

Like PC Anywhere, very insecure.

 

Nlog-runs in Linix, logs information into database, freeware, lightware.

 

Cybercop

Internet Scanner

 

Superscan 
http://www.foundstone.com/knowledge/proddesc/superscan.html 

A reasonable Windows port scanner. This will only perform TCP port scans (which are regarded as somewhat “loud”), where as other tools like Nmap will also give you better UDP port scans allowing for stealth scans. It can be a quick tool to 
run up if you want to scan something internally and not have to worry about being in stealth mode.

Network Supervisor by 3Com 

A very powerful SNMP based network-management tool used to map out IP-connected devices in a graphical, easy-to-use format. Advantages of Network Supervisor:
Shareware: Available at 3com.com. To extend use beyond 60 days, you may register online for a permanent license key. 
http://www.3com.com/ 

Scalability: Network Supervisor can support over 2000 IP-connected network devices. 
User Friendly: NS comes with a nice graphical interface that allows testers to easily view what is going on of the network in question. Presents a network map either grouped by IP subnet or as a flat Layer 2 view of the entire network. Users may specify what subnet to look for and the ability to discover boundaries in a network on various ports. (1) 

 

Distributed Port Scanning

 

Phpdistributedportscanner

http://www.digitaloffense.net:8000/phpDistributedPortScanner/

 

Dscan, based on client/server architecture

http://www.packetstorm-security.com/distributed

 

SIDEN

http://siden.sourceforge.net

LanGuard Network Scanner 
http://www.gfi.com/languard/

A fairly good port scanner for Windows and free!

 

SNMP Ping 
mailto:snmptool@sans.org

SNMP is always a major vulnerability and easy configured by accident on most network devices. This tool allows you to scan subnets very quickly and determine which devices have SNMP switched on and which SNMP traps are available.

Strobe: a port scanner. It sequentially attempts connections to TCP ports.

Wardailing

 

The Hacker’s Choice (THC)

THC-Scan 2.0 supports sequential or randomized dialing, dialing through a network out-dial, modem carrier and repeat dail-tone detection and rudimentary detection avoidance capabilities. Written by Van Hauser

http://inferno.tusculum.edu/thc

 

Toneloc: a wardialer. It looks for modems.

 

Security Vulnerability Assessment

 

Security Administrator Tool for Analyzing Network (SATAN)

One of the first widely distributed automated vulnerability scanners, introduced in 1995

 

Nessus Project, Renaud Deraison, Director

Nessus is a complete security scanner and vulnerability database for Linux, which is free and gives you free updates to the knowledge base on a regular basis. This will allow you to configure scans against network devices and pick and choose 
what style of scan or attack you would like to perform. Nessus also utilizes other great penetration tools like Nmap giving you full reports on your environment and links to potential security fixes or work arounds. You can do anything from simple 
port scanning to IIS or Operating System Denial of Service scans. This is a must have tool for every Pen test kit! Free, open source, general purpose, full-featured scanner for identifying vulnerabilities on remote systems. www.nessus.org

 

TCP Dump 
http://www.tcpdump.org

Another network analyzer for both Linux and Windows. This is a command line based tool but can be very quick to write the contents out to file to examine network packets if you are in a hurry in capturing some network data.

Whisker is a full-feature vulnerability scanning tool focusing on web server CGI scripts.

Written Rain Forest Puppy. www.wiretrip.net/rfp 

Downloadable from: http://sourceforge.net/projects/whisker/

 

VLAD the Scanner

http://razor.bindview.com/

Scans for vulnerabilities on SANS top twenty list

 

Airsnort

Encryption Key Recovery for Wireless Applications

http://airsnort.shmoo.com/

 

ICAT Vulnerability Database

http://icat.nist.gov

 

Mitre

Common Vulnerabilities, standardized naming of vulnerabilities.

http://cve.mitre.org

 

Wild list

Standardized list of virii and worms

www.wildlist.org

 

Project grep

Malicious code database and virus bulletin

www.virusbtn.com/Vgrep/

 

Network Sniffers

 

Ethereal 
http://www.ethereal.com

A good network protocol analyzer for both Linux and Windows running your network card in promiscuous mode allows you to sniff and capture data that flies past your workstation allowing you to examine packets and see what data is being transmitted across your network. A very good tool!

Ettercap 
http://ettercap.sourceforge.net

Another network sniffer for Linux, but also works over a switched network (where most network sniffers cannot) and is very good at what it does.

Sniffit by Brecht Claerhout

http://reptile.rug.ac.be/~coder/sniffit/sniffit.html

 

Snort, by Martin Roesch

http://www.snort.org

 

Airsnort

Encryption Key Recovery for Wireless Applications

http://airsnort.shmoo.com/

 

Solaris (ships with the snoop tool)

 

Tcpdump (ships with some variants of unix and linux)

 

To protect against sniffers, IP address authentication should be disabled or replaced. In UNIX the “r-commands” (rlogin, rsh, rexec and rcp) are notoriously subject to IP spooking attacks. Use secure shell (ssh), uses strong cryptography to replace weak authentication of the r-commands. Also switched networks isolated traffic.

 

Active Sniffing

 

Dsniff, inject traffic into a network, including MAC address flooding, spurious ARP traffic, fake DNS response, and person-in-the-middle attacks against SSL.

http://www.monkey.org/~dugsong/dsniff/

  

Session Hijacking

 

Hunt, by Kra

Fully functional session hijacking tool, allow an attacker to monitor and steal sessions, insert single commands, and even give the session back to the user

http://www.cri.cz/kra/index.html

 

Denial of Service Attacks

Countless denial-of-service attacks are in widespread use today

http://packetstorm.securify.com/exploits/DoS

Network-based denial-of-service attack fall into two categories: malformed packet attacks and packet floods.

Malformed packet attacks are the teardrop attack that exploits  IP fragmentation handling vulnerability. Other attacks are WinNuke, Land, LaTierra, NewTear, Bonk, Boink, etc.

 

Packet floods are the well-known SYN flood (take advantage of TCP’s three way handshake. Send only spooked SYN packets and never respond to SYN-ACK, attacker can exhaust a server’s ability to maintain state of all the initiated sessions. Directed broadcast attacks, sometimes called smurf attack, named after the first tool to exploit this technique. Uses third-party network an amplifier for the packet flood. Attacker located network on Internet that will respond to broadcast ICMP message (essentially a ping to the network’s broadcast address). All machines respond to the ping. By spoofing the ICMP request, attacker can have the network send responses to the victim.

 

Distributed denial-of-service attacks use tools such as Trin00. Tribe Flood Network 2000 (TFN2K) and Stacheldraht. First, usually remote buffer overflow attack to exploit vulnerable system on the Internet. Simple daemon processes, called Zombies, are installed on the machines. Can do SYN, UDP and ICMP flooding, smurf, malformed packet attacks.

 

Relay Attacks

 

Netcat, incredibly flexible tool written for UNIX by Hobbit, Windows NT by Weld Pond . The current version for Unix was released in 1996 by hobbit (see above). This Windows version was released by Chris Wysopal in 1998. Both hobbit and Chris are part of @stake, Inc. Netcat has been dubbed the network swiss army knife. It is a simple Unix utility which reads and writes data across network connections, using TCP or UDP protocol. It is designed to be a reliable "back-end" tool that can be used directly or easily driven by other programs and scripts. At the same time, it is a feature-rich network debugging and exploration tool, since it can create almost any kind of connection you would need and has several interesting built-in capabilities. Netcat is now part of the Red Hat Power Tools collection and comes standard on SuSE Linux, Debian Linux, NetBSD and OpenBSD distributions.

http://www.atstake.com/research/tools/index.html

 

Redir

http://oh.verio.com/~sammy/hacks

 

 

Protecting against DDOS Attacks

Defense Tactics against DOS Attacks-FedCIRC

 http://www.fedcirc.gov/docs/DDOS-defense.PDF

Remote Intrusion Detector (RID)

Downloadable from: www.theorygroup.com/Software/RID/

Can detect Trin00 DDOS attack client, Tribal flood network DDOS attack client,

Stacheldraht DDOS attack client.

 

Zombie Zapper

http://razor.bindview.com/tools/ZombieZapper_form.shtml

Works against Trin00, TFN, Stacheldraht, Trinoo for Windows and Shart DDOS attacks programs.

 

CERT Coordination Center

Distributed-Systems Intrusion Tools Workshop

www.cert.org/reports/dsit_workshop-final.html

Provides DDOS protection guidelines

 

Open Channel Foundation

Distributes software from academia, spitfire is Intrusion Detection from Mitre.org

www.openchannelsoftware.org/projects/spitfire

 

 

Stack-based buffer overflows

 

Password cracking tools

 

John-the-Ripper, by Solar Designer, focuses on cracking UNIX passwords

http://www.openwall.com/john/

 

L0phtCrack, used to crack Windows NT passwords - LC3

http://www.atstake.com/research/lc/index.html

 

Backdoors

 

Netcat, incredibly flexible tool written for UNIX by Hobbit, Windows NT by Weld Pond . The current version for Unix was released in 1996 by hobbit (see above). This Windows version was released by Chris Wysopal in 1998. Both hobbit and Chris are part of @stake, Inc. Netcat has been dubbed the network swiss army knife. It is a simple Unix utility which reads and writes data across network connections, using TCP or UDP protocol. It is designed to be a reliable "back-end" tool that can be used directly or easily driven by other programs and scripts. At the same time, it is a feature-rich network debugging and exploration tool, since it can create almost any kind of connection you would need and has several interesting built-in capabilities. Netcat is now part of the Red Hat Power Tools collection and comes standard on SuSE Linux, Debian Linux, NetBSD and OpenBSD distributions.

http://www.atstake.com/research/tools/index.html

NOBO

Nobo detects Back Orifice

 

Back Orifice - Windows Remote Administration Tool or Hacker's Delight?
Back Orifice is the brainchild of the well know "Cult of the Dead Cow", an underground computer group noted for its hacker antics. Though promoted as a "network administration tool", Back Orifice (commonly known as BO) poses considerable threat to computer users when in the wrong hands. BO is a windows based application that can be stealthily transmitted to unknowing users through email attachements, shareware, legitimate applications or any number of different vehicles. Operates on UDP Port 31337. The program has two distinct components:
Defensive Options to protect against hostile use of Back Orifice.

There are several methods of detecting and protecting against hostile use of Back Orifice. Existing BO detection tools such as "NOBO" vary in effectiveness and can only detect Back Orifice if the configuration is known or if Back Orifice is operating in the default configuration (using port 31337). Network Associates (McAfee) Anti-Virus and Norton Anti-Virus detect BO, provided the most current version of the virus signature file in on your workstation. Detecting and eliminating BO are two different matters. In order for BO to do its work, it must be executed. Evidence of this will be found in the system registry. Run "Regedit" from the start menu and find the registry key:

"HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\RunServices".

This key entry tells the operating system which applications will be executed at start-up. Inspect the contents of this key for suspicious entries. BO normally installs intself using the filename " .exe" (space.exe) but may be configured as any filename. If you see a suspicious entry in this key that cannot be identified, it may indicate the presence of BO. Do not delete this entry until you can verify it. Another indication of BO presence is the existence of the file "windll.dll". This file only supports a few of the BO capabilities. Deleting this file DOES NOT disable BO. Once you have identified the BO server application file, you may delete it and the corresponding registry key.

In addition to the above methods, using the resident "NetStat" tool will show any data connections to remote hosts. Pay particular attention to UDP transmissions to remote hosts. To run NetStat, type "netstat -a 5 > filename.log". This operation will monitor your connections and record the output to filename.log, updating every 5 seconds. Review the log for any suspicious UDP connections to remote host with which you are unfamiliar.

In addition to the above information, The CERT® Coordination Center has researched Back Orifice and compiled a vulnerability note addressing the issue.

Trojan Horse and Rootkits

 

BackOrifice2000

www.bo2k.com

 

A whole variety of UNIX Rootkits

Knark, by Creed, is kernel-level Rootkit

http://packetstorm.securify.com/UNIX/penetration/rootkits

NT Rootkits

www.rootkit.com

 

Plasmoid, Solaris kernel level rootkit

http://www.infowar.co.uk/thc/slkm-1.0.html

 

To protect against Rootkits

www.tripwire.com

 

Access Control – Studies and Research

 

Role Based Access Control

 

High Integrity Software Systems Assurance

http://hissa.nist.gov

 

Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML)

An emerging XML-based standard for exchanging authentication and authorization information. Supported by Baltimore Technologies, Crosslogix, Sun, IBM's Tivoli Systems and others in a SAML interoperability demonstration. The biggest shot in the arm, however, will come from the Liberty Alliance, a group of vendors and corporate users who have spent the past six months creating a single sign-on specification. The group will release its work, and announce it is supporting SAML and adding nearly 20 new members.

  

Platforms

 

Windows 2000

MCP TechMentor Summit on Security and Windows Security Challenge. July 2002

- The most important thing I learned is that Windows 2000, contrary to much of what you read, can be made very, very secure. We had more than 40,000 attacks, from all over the world, on the network that our experts locked down. Not a single attack was successful at penetrating to our internal network. Keep in mind that we used standard security checklists and the Microsoft Security Operations Guide to harden our network; no third-party products were used, and no exotic configurations were put in place. These are things each of you can do; you don't have to be a security expert to use the methods our team used. Of course, no network connected to the Internet can be made totally hack-proof. But I think the Windows Security Challenge proved that you can keep most of the bad guys out -- even in a Windows world.

 

-- Keith Ward, editor

mailto:keith.ward@mcpmag.com

 

Careers in Information Technology Security

 

MCP TechMentor Summit on Security and Windows Security Challenge. July 2002

Security is far from a glamorous field. At our panel discussion on IT security careers, Kirk Bailey, chief security officer for the city of Seattle, painted a portrait of a job that has very long hours, ever-increasing liability risk and little praise. Those of you thinking about going into IT security because it's "hot" had better rethink your position. Unless you love the field, you'll probably find that the drawbacks outweigh the rewards.

 

Breaking into Information Security-Information Security Magazine

http://www.infosecuritymag.com/articles/may01/features_career_advice.shtml

 

Information Security Certifications

 

Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP)

www.isc2.org

 

www.giac.org

Global Information Assurance Certification

 

CIW Security Exam

 

British Institute for Standards

BS7799 Lead Auditor

 

Information Technology Certifications

 

IBM Object Oriented exam.
http://certcities.com/editorial/exams/story.asp?EditorialsID=61

 

MCSE

http://www.microsoft.com/traincert/offers/win2000.asp

 

CIO Resources

 

CIO Security Worksheet

http://www2.cio.com/research/surveys/securityindex.cfm

  

Other links:

 

http://www.securitywriters.org/library/texts/firewall/pro/what_is_firewall.pdf

http://www.securitywriters.org/library/texts/firewall/pro/what_is_firewall.php

Vicomsoft Resource Knowledge Base - http://www.vicomsoft.com/knowledge/reference/
RFC 1631 - The IP Network Address Translator (NAT)
InterHack.net’s Firewalls FAQ - http://www.interhack.net/pubs/fwfaq/
PhoneBoy’s FireWall-1 FAQ - http://www.phoneboy.com/
DeathStar’s Firewall Security website - http://www.deathstar.ch/security/fw1/
SecurityPortal.com’s Enterprise Firewall documentation - http://securityportal.com/firewalls/enterprise/
Check Point FireWall-1/VPN-1 - http://www.checkpoint.com/products/firewall-1/

Security News related Sites

http://www.Incidents.org
http://www.theregister.co.uk  
http://www.silicon.com
http://www.security-protocols.com/index.php

New Vulnerabilities

http://bugtraq.inet-one.com/
http://www.cert.org/nav/index_red.html  
http://www.microsoft.com/security
http://www.ciac.org/ciac/bulletinsByType/bul_vendor_list.html

Advisories

http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/advisory.html
http://nsa2.www.conxion.com/  

Firewall information (seeing the wood from the trees)

http://www.robertgraham.com/pubs/firewall-seen.html  
http://www.snort.org  

Hacking  

http://www.webstore.fr/webabonnes/tahiti/nt.htm  
http://www.cavebear.com/CaveBear/Ethernet/vendor.html

TCP Ports  

http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~rakerman/port-table.html  
http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
http://www.tsmservices.com/masq/
http://www.ec11.dial.pipex.com/port-num.shtml  
http://www.stengel.net/tcpports.htm

Securing

Microsoft Internet Information Server 4 Checklist
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/
default.asp?url=/technet/itsolutions/security/tools/iischk.asp

Securing Microsoft Internet Information Server 5 Checklist
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/
technet/itsolutions/security/tools/iis5chk.asp

Securing Microsoft Windows NT4 Domain Controller Checklist
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/
technet/itsolutions/security/tools/dccklst.asp

Securing Microsoft Windows NT4 Member Server Checklist
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/
technet/itsolutions/security/tools/mbrsrvcl.asp
 

Securing NT4 C2 Configuration Checklist
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/
technet/security/tools/c2config.asp
 

 

 

Software Tools of the Trade:

Provided below are some free defense utilities or tools of the trade for penetration testing.

Bastille – These are a collection of tools and scripts for "hardening" Red Hat Linux distributions once they are out of the box and best done before they are put into production. They aid new system administrators in making Red Hat more secure. Bastille Linux project – http://www.bastille-linux.org/

Crack – Crack is one of the original and still widely used password crackers for UNIX based systems. Used by white hats and black hats alike. Alec Muffett, Developer – http://www.users.dircon.co.uk/~crypto/download/c50-faq.html

Ipmasquerade – This is a Linux network address translation (NAT) function that is incorporated into most Linux distributions. Often Ipmasquerade is combined with Ipchains to form rule-based, routing and network access points. Information – http://ipmasq.cjb.net/

Linux FreeS/WAN – These services allow you to build secure tunnels and VPNS via IPSec/IKE implementation. Linux FreeS/WAN Project – http://www.freeswan.org/download.html

Nessus – This security scanner is intended to update and improve on SATAN. It is one of the many vulnerability-based scanners. The "Nessus" Project – http://www.nessus.org/download.html

NMAP Portscanner – This network port scanning tool can be utilized to scan networks for open ports and even OS identification. "fyodor" – http://www.insecure.org/nmap/

SAINT – This vulnerability-based security scanner, also has an available "WebSAINT" version. World Wide Digital Security Inc. – http://wwdsilx.wwdsi.com/saint/

Shadow – Intrusion detection system based on TCPdump, developed in part by the US Navy. Naval Surface Warfare Center – http://www.nswc.navy.mil/ISSEC/CID/

Squid – This is a full-featured Web proxy cache that supports Internet Caching Protocol (ICP) and SSL. Duane Wessels, project coordinator – http://squid.nlanr.net

Sudo – "Superuser do" allows controlled access to root. This Unix based utility can be used to log superuser use and to restrict access to users or groups. Todd C. Miller, project coordinator – http://www.courtesan.com/sudo/

Tripwire – This commercial version of freeware Intrusion Detection System remains open source and holds some free capabilities. Tripwire Inc. http://www.tripwire.com/downloads/

Penetration Testing Tool Sites:

www.cotse.com - the computer professionals reference: http://wetelephant.cotse.com/tools/

Tips for NT Administrators in the area of Penetration Testing, Hacking, and Intrusion Detection: http://www.is-it-true.org/pt/#GlossP

DRDOS

Denying Network Service

By DEBORAH RADCLIFF,  JULY 15, 2002

 

At least once each month, Terra Lycos SA's high-profile Internet media products, such as Lycos Mail, Tripod and Angelfire, come under a denial-of-service (DOS) attack. As host to more than 300 distinct Web sites and 40.3 million users, the international hosting and Internet media company makes an obvious target, explains Tim Wright, chief technology officer and CIO at Terra Lycos' U.S. headquarters in Waltham, Mass.

 

The attacks aren't the traffic-clogging distributed denial-of-service (DDOS) attacks that used remote-controlled servers to flood Amazon, Yahoo, eBay and others with debilitating levels of traffic in early 2000.

 

Oldie but Baddie

 

The DOS attacks Wright sees are much older than that. They're called syn flood, a type of attack that has been around as long as TCP. Syn floods fake the initial connection synchronization (syn) requests. The target responds with an acknowledgement (ack), for which it will receive no response. The target server holds the session open for a given length of time and then times out. A high-volume succession of these fake sessions prevents the machine from opening legitimate connections.

 

There's really no protection against syn floods, because they take advantage of the inherent purpose of routing protocols - to route TCP session connection requests. "The worst kind of attacks are where the protocol says it's normal," Wright explains.

 

Now, syn floods are getting a whole lot nastier. A new form of syn, called a distributed reflection denial-of-service (DRDOS) attack, knocked Laguna Hills, Calif.-based Gibson Research Corp. (GRC) off the Web for four hours in January. A DRDOS attack is the inverse of a syn flood, says Steve Gibson, president of GRC. Gibson coined the term for the new attack method after his experience in January. That's when attackers sprayed GRC.com's IP across core Internet routers and connected TCP devices, making them believe that GRC.com was trying to initiate a connection. Being the obedient devices that they are, they responded en masse to GRC.com with their ack replies. GRC.com's server, knowing that it didn't initiate the TCP session requests, simply dropped the acks. Thinking their ack requests were lost in cyberspace, the devices tried again - up to four times - magnifying the attack.

 

Gibson says he's aware of many companies that have come under such DRDOS attacks. "Web hosting sites and other major sites are the biggest targets," he says. "You upset some script kiddie they especially don't like spammers - and they'll punish somebody."  Filtering doesn't help because it slows all traffic, say Wright and Gibson. In a DRDOS attack, the ack packets come from everywhere, so there's no way to filter. The only way to deal with such an attack is to take the target machine off the Web and wait it out, or ask your Internet service provider to "null route" (drop incoming syn or ack packets to the affected machine), Gibson explains. That way, the attackers can't block traffic to other machines on that network segment. But then, he adds, "the attacker's still won. They've shut your site down."

 

SCADA and DCS

 

Embedded Control Systems and Security

There's a whole lot of embedded control systems in our society, controlling things as diverse as vending machines and automobiles and power plants, and they've been designed with not a whole lot of security. Actually, mostly they've mostly been designed with no security.  And that's not a good thing.

These are distributed control systems (DCS), or supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems.  The simplest ones just carry measurement data.  More complicated ones throw railway switches, open and close circuit breakers, and adjust valve flow in lots of different pipelines.  The most complicated ones control devices and systems at an even higher level.

For the most part, these systems have been obscure and isolated -- this is why their designers never bothered with security -- but more and more they're being connected to the Internet.  And the fear is that now they can be taken over by hackers, criminals, or (gasp!) terrorists.

This has been true for decades now, but the War on (Some) Terrorism has brought this into the news.  Many are worried that that some terrorist with a laptop in Peshawar can open the floodgates of a dam in the United States, or shut down the American power grid.  It's a frightening prospect.

And certainly the threats are real.  These systems can be successfully attacked.  And given the sheer complexity of some of the systems being controlled, catastrophic failures are certainly possible.

But I think they're unlikely.  First, as insecure as the systems are, it's hard to hack in and do maximum damage.  It's probably easy to hack in and stumble around until something breaks, but that's not nearly as spectacular.  For once, obscurity is working in our favor; the simple facts that the commands are arcane and obscure, the effects of individual changes are not obvious, and there are no readily available manuals, makes the system more secure.

Second, low-tech terrorism is much more reliable, and much more effective, than high-tech.  While these threats are real, I rate them as lower than explosives or lunatics with automatic weapons.  Sure, opening sewage floodgates into the river will make headlines, but bombing one of the three water tunnels into Manhattan will do much more damage.

The real threat here is the remote attacker.  I think the likely scenario is that some terrorist-wannabe -- not a real terrorist but someone who reads about terrorism in the press and is sympathetic -- in some random country will try to attack infrastructures this way.  They'll break in, and they'll do some random damage.  It won't be spectacular, but it will be successful.

The solution is twofold.  One, keep critical DCS and SCADA systems off the Internet.  Two, fix the protocols to add security.  And three, don't panic about the threats; the risk isn't that great.

Point: We're at risk.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A50765-2002Jun26.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_2070000/2070706.stm

http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/06/27/alqaeda.cyber.threat/index.html

http://www.nipc.gov/publications/infobulletins/2002/ib02-001.htm


Counterpoint: No, we're not.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2002/06/3


An actual attack:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/22579.html

Tools, Tools, and TOOLS!!
Firas Shaheen
November 22, 2001

Have you ever said to yourself, "There are just so many tools, and it’s hard to keep track of all of them and know what each one does?" Well I do all the time, that’s why I decided to write this quick reference on popular tools (It’s impossible to cover all tools, but I will try to cover as much as possible), with a brief explanation on how they work, and where to get them. I am going to cover tools for both Linux and Windows platforms, those tools will consist of (IDSes, Firewalls, Exploits, Scanners, Reconnaissance, Password crackers, Auditing, etc). But before I start I would like to talk in general about a successful attack and some of the tools involved. Why? Because:

"IN ORDER TO BEAT AN ATTACKER, YOU’VE GOT TO THINK LIKE A HACKER."

Successful Attacks consists of:

  1. Network Reconnaissance: "When thieves decide to rob a bank, they don’t just walk in and start demanding money (not the smart ones, anyway). Instead, they take great pains in gathering information about the bank - the armored car routes and delivery times, the video cameras, and the number of tellers, escape exits, and anything else that will help in a successful misadventure. Hacking Exposed - Second Edition." The same requirement applies to successful attackers. Network recon is like having a blue print of the network you’re planning to attack, thus making your job easier and safer in terms of getting caught. How does network recon works? By finding out valuable information about the target network like (Domain Names, IP Blocks, IDSes, Services running, Firewalls, Platforms supported, Protocols used, DMZ, and the infrastructure of the network). How do I find all this information? Use the reference at the end for the tools required and how to use them.
  2. Gaining Access: Gaining access can be achieved by simple methods, i.e. running an exploit against the target server, or advance methods, i.e. session or TCP hijack. Recall Mr. Kevin Mitnick’s attack against Tsutomu Shimomura’s system, "The attack used two techniques: SYN flooding and TCP hijacking. The SYN flood kept one system from being able to transmit. While it was in a mute state, the attacker assumed its apparent identity, and hijacked the TCP connection. Mitnick detected a trust relationship between two computers and exploited that relationship. Network Intrusion Detection, an Analyst’s Handbook - Second Edition." Access can also be achieved by many other ways, Ex. password cracking, sniffing, physical access to a machine, default accounts, social engineering, etc. Which method shall I use? It depends on the environment, nature of the attack, and the info gathered from your network recon. What are the tools and techniques required for the attack? Use the reference at the end for the tools required and how to use them.
  3. Covering you Tracks: So you got in!! And you have a blueprint of the network, now what? "Usually after committing a crime, the next step would be to alter the seen as if it never happened." This is done by:
    1. Eliminating traces: Fingerprints, video surveillance, missing items. From a security professional perspective, this could mean: Editing and clearing security logs, compromising the Syslog server, replacing system files by nested similar files. Tools like rootkits do that for you.
    2. Disguise: You’re in a place were everyone is a doctor and you don’t want to be detected, what would you do? Get dressed like a doctor. The same applies when talking about network security, but instead of getting dressed like a doctor, we create legitimate accounts on the compromised server and use those for our disguise.
    3. Backdoors: What was the scope of your attack in the first place, was it a one-hit-finish? "Break-in, get the prize, then leave" or was it a continues attack? "Setup a sniffer on the compromised system, then check on the collected goodies now and then. It could be credit card numbers on an e-commerce site or password hashes on an NT based network waiting to be cracked by L0pht Crack." If that was the case then setting up a backdoor is a must, because you wouldn’t want to set off sensors by using the same exploit over and over. A backdoor could be a Trojan Virus (SubSeven, NetBus), or in step "b." the creation of legitimate accounts.

Now that we have seen the steps a successful attack consists of, we will demonstrate each step with a simple example on some of the tools needed:

Technique Tools Platform Download
Network Reconnaissance Nmap 2.54BETA30 Linux http://www.insecure.org/nmap/nmap_download.html
Hping2 Linux http://www.hping.org/download.html

1- Finding machines that are up on the network

"Obvious answer: send an ICMP echo-request (ping) packet to each IP address and wait for a reply to determine which hosts are up. But many hosts filter out ping requests or replies! Example:

amy~> ping microsoft.com

PING microsoft.com (207.46.230.219) from 208.184.74.98 : 56(84) bytes of data.

--- microsoft.com ping statistics ---

8 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss

Solution: "TCP" ping. Nmap -sP By default, Nmap sends a TCP ACK (acknowledgement) packet to port 80 in parallel with an ICMP ping request. If a RST packet (or a ping reply) comes back, we know the host exists.

In some cases you may want to probe machines with a TCP SYN packet instead of an ACK. This is done with -PS. This option uses SYN (connection request) packets instead of ACK packets for root users. Hosts that are up should respond with a RST (or, rarely, a SYN|ACK). http://www.insecure.org/nmap/OSDEM_Presentation/ "

2- Determining the ports that are open

"Open TCP ports can be determined by a SYN scan. This is the preferred general-purpose TCP scan type, also known as half-open scanning. Give Nmap the -sS argument to perform this kind of scan. Don't forget UDP scanning! (Nmap option: -sU). Other scan types: FIN, XMAS, and NULL scans (-sF, -sX, -sN). More details on the mechanics of these scans are available in the Nmap man page ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/nmap_manpage.html )

Advanced scan type: ACK scan (-sA) for probing firewalls/filtering systems.

Advanced scan type: IP Protocol scan -sO. Nmap usually focuses on TCP, UDP, and ICMP, but there is a whole World of other protocols available for advanced attacks and information gathering. The Protocol Scan cycles through the 8-bit protocol field sending raw IP headers without any data. An ICMP Protocol Unreachable error means the target does not accept packets for the given protocol.

For example, here is a SYN scan:

#nmap -sS target.example.com/24

This command will launch a stealth SYN scan against each machine that is up out of the 255 machines on class 'C'where target.example.com resides. http://www.insecure.org/nmap/OSDEM_Presentation/ "

3- Determining network architecture

hping2 --traceroute -t 1 -2 --baseport 53 -keep -V -p 5023 gw.target.com

This means do a traceroute, starting with ttl=1 using UDP packets with a source port of 53 (dns) and a destination port of 5023 against gw.target.com. -V just turns on verbosity. Traceroute will give us an idea of how the network structure looks like (Firewalls, Routers, etc).

Finding what OS is running is an important step in gathering information (Network recon.) and some of the ways to find out this information is by issuing the command:

nmap –O targethost.com

Nmap (with -O) can usually determine the OS in use via a technique known as TCP/IP fingerprinting.

Also if the target host was running a web server you can telnet to it on port 80 and get the server version i.e. (IIS 5.0) thus the host is running a version of NT.

# telnet target.com 80

>GET /blah HTTP/1.1

HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request

Server: Microsoft-IIS/5.0

....

....

A lot of services give out valuable information like in our previous example, web servers, others like DNS servers with zone transfer enabled can give a great deal of information.

# nslookup

>server 11.12.13.2 (we specify a domain server)

>set type=any (will list all domains and hosts)

>ls –d target.com. >> ./Zonetransfer.out

Zonetransfer.out will have a list of all the hosts with the name target.com. Tools like axfr would do the whole work for you, DNS zone transfers.

ARIN "American Registry for Internet Numbers"

#whois "target.com."@whois.arin.net

(Would give you address blocks e.g. 11.12.13.0-11.12.13.255)

#whois 11.12.13.0@whois.arin.net

(Would give you the ISP and the backbone address block of the domain)

Technique Tools Platform Download
Gaining Access Legion Windows http://www.rhino9.com
L0pht crack Windows http://www.l0pth.com

1- Finding shares on the target network

Example: After doing a network recon you find out that the target network xyz.com:

Next step is to use Legion 2.1 to scan for open shares. In the IP range we enter 11.12.13.0 – 11.12.13.255. Legion will first attempt to check those IP ranges to see weather or not they are up and support NetBIOS, then it will scan those hosts that are up for open shares and will display the results in the format of IP address plus the directory shared. "You will be surprised to see how many people share their whole C: drive with full access permissions (Read, Write, and Delete)". We found out the IP address 11.12.13.14 has the C: drive shared with FULL ACCESS, now we map it to our local drive then we browse to:

C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Start Menu\Programs and we place a preconfigured password sniffer so that it starts up next time the system reboots

2- Collecting the goodies

After we have collected the sniffed hashes and user accounts, now its time to crack them, for that purpose we use the best cracking tool for windows L0pthCrack. After successfully cracking a password we then use it to log onto the DC, thus, acting as a legitimate user.

Technique Tools Platform Download
Covering you Tracks Wipe Linux ftp://ftp.technotronic.com/unix/log-tools/wipe-1.00.tgz
Zap Linux ftp://ftp.technotronic.com/unix/log-tools/zap.c

Wipe: Removes log entries from UTMP, WTMP, LASTLOG and ACCT entries. It will compile on virtually anything and wipe the logs CORRECTLY for that variant of UNIX system.

Zap: Will fill the Wtmp and Utmp entries corresponding to the entered username. It also Zeros out the last login data for the specific user, fingering that user will show 'Never Logged In'.

 

"The Utmp log records, among other things: the username, device name, time, and origin in a binary format. Programs like who, users, and finger read the utmp file and display its contents.

Wtmp can be found in /var/log, and is the same as utmp in terms of file type and format. It records the username, device, event time, and connection origin as a binary file. The major difference in file content lies in the fact that wtmp keeps a history of all logins, logouts, and system events, unlike Utmp which acts like a snapshot. GSEC – UNIX Auditing"

Okay, so we looked at how attacks are done and we mentioned "some" of the tools used and when they’re used. Its time to look at other tools, though we couldn’t possibly mention all of them here, I left some links for more tools at the references part.

The main purpose of this write was to give you a sense of how and when tools are used. From an attackers point of view tools can be separated into 3 categories: Reconnaissance, Gaining Access, and Covering Tracks. Where from a security professional point of view tools can be separated into: Defense in Depth tools (HIDS/NIDS, Firewalls, Antivirus, Honeypots, etc) and personal security assessment tools (Scanners, Password Crackers, Exploits, anti reconnaissance tools, etc).

Argus
Argus is a generic IP network transaction auditing tool. Argus runs as an application level daemon, promiscuously reading network datagram’s from a specified interface, and generates network traffic status records for the network activity that it encounters.
Download:
ftp://ftp.andrew.cmu.edu/pub/argus/

Asax
Asax. An Advanced Security audit trail Analysis on uniX.
Download:
ftp://ftp.cerias.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/sysutils/asax

Asmodeous Port Scanner (WebTrends)
Asmodeous network security scanner for Windows NT.
Download:
http://www.webtrends.com/products/wsa/

COPS version 1.04
The Computer Oracle and Password System (COPS) package from Purdue University. Examines a system for a number of known weaknesses and alerts the system administrator to them; in some cases it can automatically correct these problems.
Download:
ftp://ftp.jaring.my/pub/cert/tools/cops/

Fremont
Fremont is a research prototype for discovering key network characteristics, such as hosts, gateways, and topology. It runs on SunOS, and has been tested on both Sun3 and Sun4 hardware, on SunOS 4.1.1. The ARPwatch and RIPwatch Explorer Modules use the Sun's Network Interface Tap. This directory contains information, the latest version and patches.
Download:
ftp://ftp.cerias.purdue.edu/pub/tools/unix/netutils/fremont

HPing
A network analysis tool, HPing is a tool which enables you to send packet with non traditional IP stack parameters and gather information from the results of the incoming packets (which were generated in responds to the sent packet), this information isn't displayed by regular application since much of it is for debugging and internal network functionality.
Download:
http://www.kyuzz.org/antirez/oldhping.html

Internet Security Scanner (ISS) (Evaluation copy)
ISS versions 1.21 and 1.3. This is a program by Christopher Klaus. A multi-level security scanner that checks a UNIX system for a number of known security holes such as problems with sendmail, improperly configured NFS file sharing, etc.
Download:
ftp://ftp.iss.net/pub/iss/

NESSUS Alpha 2 -fix 4
Nessus is a free, open sourced and easy-to-use security auditing tool for Linux, BSD and some other system. It is multithreaded and plugin based, and has a nice X11 interface.
Download:
http://www.nessus.org

Nss
nss is a Perl script that scans either individual remote hosts or entire subnets of hosts for various simple network security problems. The majority of the tests can be performed by any non-privileged user on a typical Unix machine.
Download:
http://www.ja.net/CERT/Software/nss/

SAINT
SAINT is the Security Administrator's Integrated Network Tool. In its simplest mode, it gathers as much information about remote hosts and networks as possible by examining such network services as finger, NFS, NIS, ftp and tftp, rexd, statd, and other services. The information gathered includes the presence of various network information services as well as potential security flaws -- usually in the form of incorrectly setup or configured network services, well-known bugs in system or network utilities, or poor or ignorant policy decisions. It can then either report on this data or use a simple rule-based system to investigate any potential security problems.
Download:
http://wwdsilx.wwdsi.com/saint/

SARA 2.0.5
"Security Auditor's Research Assistant"-security audit tool, GPL license.
Download:
http://home.arc.com/sara/index.html

SATAN version 1.1.1
SATAN, the System Administrator Tool for Analyzing Networks, is a network security analyzer designed by Dan Farmer and Wietse Venema. SATAN scans systems connected to the network noting the existence of well known, often exploited vulnerabilities. For each type of problem found, SATAN offers a tutorial that explains the problem and what can be done.
Download:
http://www.fish.com/satan/

Tiger version 2.2.3 and 2.2.4
Tiger (from Texas A & M University) is a set of scripts that scan a Unix system looking for security problems, in the same fashion as COPS.
Download:
ftp://net.tamu.edu.pub/security/TAMU/

Web Trend Security Analyzer (Evaluation pack)
WebTrends Security Analyzer helps you discover and fix the latest known security vulnerabilities on your Internet, intranet and extranet. Systems are analyzed on demand or at scheduled intervals, allowing prioritization and comparative reports to be generated with recommended fixes that resolve possible exploitations.
Download:
http://www.webtrends.com/products/wsa/

References:

Network Reconnaissance Techniques,
URL:
http://www.insecure.org/nmap/OSDEM_Presentation/

Fyodor. "Nmap network security scanner man page",
URL -
http://www.insecure.org/nmap/nmap_manpage.html.

Fobic. "Examining Advanced Remote OS Detection Methods/Concepts using Perl", Feb 03, 2001
URL -
http://www.packetnexus.com/kb/greyarts/docs/981766898:16776.html.

CERT® Summary CS-2001-02,
URL:
http://www.cert.org/summaries/CS-2001-02.html

NT Security Pointers and Resources,
URL:
http://www.lanw.com/training/tisc/securityurls.htm

Rhino9 Products,
URL:
http://packetstorm.decepticons.org/groups/rhino9/

Automated DNS Zone Transfer Resolution,
URL:
http://www.isi.edu/~govindan/cs558f97/labs/dnszone.html

More Tools,
http://www.hackingexposed.com/tools/tools.html (Both Linux and Windows)
http://www.linux.org/apps/all/Networking/Security_/_Admin.html (Linux)
http://www.nmrc.org/files/snt/ (Windows)
http://netsecurity.about.com/cs/hackertools/ (Windows)

Bibliography:

"Hacking Exposed: Network Security Secrets and Solutions – Second Edition" McGraw Hill Professional Publishing, 2001.

"Network Intrusion Detection: An Analyst’s Handbook – Second Edition" New Riders Publishing, 2001.

 

 

Key Players in U.S. Government's Cybersecurity Efforts

Compiled by Brian Krebs
washingtonpost.com Staff Writer
Wednesday, June 26, 2002; 5:34 PM

 

The Bush Administration:

Richard Clarke: President Bush's cybersecurity adviser has sought to make computer security a national security issue, taking his case to the private sector companies that now operate the majority of the nation's most vital computer systems.

John Tritak: Director of the Commerce Department's Critical Infrastructure Assurance Office (www.ciao.gov). The Bush administration wants to fold CIAO into its planned Homeland Security Department, where it will be responsible for ensuring information sharing among the various intelligence departments slated for inclusion in the proposed cabinet level agency.

Ron Dick: Serves as director of the National Infrastructure Protection Center (www.nipc.gov), an arm of the FBI responsible for coordinating communication on computer security concerns between the federal government and the private sector. The NIPC is also targeted for inclusion in the Bush administration's proposed Department of Homeland Security.

U.S. Congress:

Sen. Robert Bennett (R-Utah): Introduced the Critical Infrastructure Information Security Act of 2001, a bill that would encourage businesses to share data about cyber attacks and vulnerabilities with the federal government by exemption the information from Freedom of Information Act requests. The proposal also would give companies limited antitrust protections for sharing such information within individual business sectors.

Reps. Tom Davis (R-Va.) and James Moran (D-Va.): Co-sponsors of a similar antitrust and FOIA exemption bill in the House.

Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas): Sponsor of the "Cyber Security Enhancement Act," which requires the U.S. Sentencing Commission to consider a number of new aspects of online crime in coming up with sentencing recommendations in criminal cases.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.): Author of the "Cyber Security Research and Development Act," legislation that would earmark $970 million in funding over five years for government agencies to research ways to improve U.S. computer and network security. The bill awaits action by the full Senate.

Rep. Sherwood Boehlert (R-NY): Author of a similar bill, the "Cyber Security Research and Development Act." The bill, which passed the House earlier this year, contains slightly less funding than the Senate version.

Rep. Stephen Horn (R-Calif.): Chairman of the House Government Reform subcommittee that hands out annual computer security report cards to each executive branch agency. The average grade last year was a "D-minus," prompting the White House Office of Management and Budget to promise that will slash funding for key programs at agencies that do no make computer security a higher priority.

Private Sector:

Harris Miller: President of the Information Technology Association of America (www.itaa.org).

Alan Paller: Director of research for the SANS Institute, a computer security training organization that has worked with the federal government on a variety of cybersecurity issues (www.sans.org).

Timeline: The U.S. Government and Cybersecurity

Compiled by David McGuire
washingtonpost.com Staff Writer
Wednesday, June 26, 2002; 5:31 PM

 

The federal government got its defining wakeup call about the nation's reliance on information technology systems and the vulnerabilities facing those systems in the years and months leading up to Jan. 1, 2000. Experts warned that the dreaded "Y2K Bug" would bring down networks and critical systems around the world.

In the process of trying to determine what public and private systems were susceptible to Y2K failures, Congress and the White House learned of a host of unrelated vulnerabilities. While the millennial date change eventually passed without major incident, administrative and legislative efforts in that area provided the much of the framework for the federal government's existing cybersecurity apparatus.

July 1996: Rep. Stephen Horn (R-Calif.) publishes his first quarterly Year 2000 readiness "report card," giving many agencies failing grades. Following the millennial date rollover, Horn issues similar report cards grading agencies on their cybersecurity readiness. In both cases, the grades, particularly the poor ones, spark greater scrutiny of federal information technology officials.

February 1998: President Clinton appoints former Deputy Budget Director John Koskinen to chair his Year 2000 Conversion Council. The council centralizes executive branch efforts to ready government agencies for the date rollover. The council also becomes a template for later executive branch efforts to centralize oversight of cybersecurity threats.

April 1998: Realizing that Y2K threats touch systems across many sectors and as such might come under the jurisdiction of several different congressional bodies, U.S. Senate leaders empanel a special committee on Y2K readiness. Chaired by Utah Republican Robert Bennett, the committee keeps close tabs on businesses and government efforts to ready their systems for the date rollover. Although the committee is set to disband a few months after the date change, Bennett pushes to morph the panel into a permanent cybersecurity body following the date change. While the committee does disband, its efforts lay the groundwork for many later congressional cybersecurity efforts.

May 1998: President Clinton appoints Richard Clarke National Coordinator for Critical Infrastructure Protection Security and Counterterrorism. Clarke is charged with overseeing policies and programs relating to electronic security. Clarke repeatedly warns that the United States could face an "electronic Pearl Harbor" if it fails to beef up its cyber-defenses.

July 1999: President Clinton signs the Year 2000 Readiness and Responsibility Act, which limits the legal liability of companies that make good faith efforts to fix their systems in advance of the date rollover. The law says companies being sued for technological failures may raise a Y2K defense if they can prove they took adequate steps to prepare their systems for the switch.

February 2000: A spate of crippling distributed denial of service (DDOS) attacks bring down several of the world's largest and most popular e-commerce sites, costing the companies millions in lost revenue. The attacks trigger a string of congressional hearings and legislative proposals aimed at closing security holes and intensifying the hunt for cyber vandals.

October 2001: President Bush establishes a federal critical infrastructure protection board, naming Clinton appointee Richard Clarke his special adviser for cyberspace security. The board is charged with making sure that state and local governments and non-governmental organizations are doing their respective parts to maintain effective warning systems and share information they receive about threats and attacks. As special adviser, Clarke occupies a loftier position in the Bush White House than he did under Clinton.

November 2001: The U.S. General Services Administration announces that it will draw on more than 150 written recommendations from telecommunications companies as it ponders its next move toward the possible creation of a government-wide Intranet called "GovNet." Final plans for GovNet have not yet been announced.

February 2002: President Bush proposes an additional $4 billion in security spending in his 2003 budget request. Much of that funding is earmarked for electronic security measures.

 

Related Documents and Resources On The Web
Compiled by The Washington Post and washingtonpost.com
Wednesday, June 26, 2002; 5:48 PM

National Infrastructure Protection Center (www.nipc.gov)
Terrorist Interest in Water Supply and SCADA Systems (Information Bulletin 02-001, 30 January 2002)

Infraguard (www.infragard.net)
Infraguard is a partnership between the FBI and private industry to protect IT systems in critical infrastructure. The organization issued a response to Sept. 11, warning members to take new precautions.

The White House
President George W. Bush last October issued executive order 13231 on critical infrastructure protection

General Accounting Office
Congress' investigative arm issued a report on Sept. 26, 2001, detailing problems with government's infrastructure protection. (Report is in PDF format.)

Miscellaneous Resources

www.robertgraham.com offers a page describing the methods of "black hat" hackers and some of the tools they use.

www.nationalatlas.gov features a dataset of the country's largest dams.

Advanced Control Systems is a leading vendor of digital control systems for electrical utilities.

The National Petroleum Council issued a timely report last June, Securing Oil and Natural Gas Infrastructures (see Ch. 2, report is in PDF format).

Agency raises the bar on tech security Non-profit works to plug holes -- for free 

By Byron Acohido 

USA TODAY SEATTLE -- Virginia Tech's Randy Marchany used to think the network of 24,000 computers he manages for the state's largest university was adequately protected against cyberattacks. But that was before he got his hands on new software distributed free by an organization called the Center for Internet Security. The software quickly found vulnerabilities in Virginia Tech's network. The center also gave Marchany a simple program to find and close common security holes, improving the network's security threefold. ''It raised the bar much higher,'' Marchany says. As society relies on the Internet and computer networks more, the security of those networks is increasingly being breached -- threatening the future of electronic commerce and even national security. Software makers say they're pushing to improve security -- but that's only part of the fix, experts say. Getting companies and institutions to be smarter about using software is the other part. And the little-known Center for Internet Security has arrived with a potential silver bullet that promises to go a long way toward making that happen. Its aim: give all computer users a set of ''best practice'' guidelines to secure their software -- and give them the software tools to do it. That simple practice would close many of the security holes in the operating systems that drive the Internet, center officials say. One lawmaker has proposed all federal agencies adopt such best practices. And companies and institutions are giving the center's work high marks. ''The user community is driving this thing, and the reason that's happening is because users don't have their dollars tied up in selling a product,'' says Fred Kerby, information systems manager at the Naval Surface Warfare Center, which helped draft the guidelines. Attacks rising The security situation is dire. Microsoft, IBM, Sun Microsystems and other software makers have left their operating systems vulnerable while pumping out feature-rich systems configured to shift more commerce onto the Web. But that approach, while enriching the software makers and spurring the global economy, also opened myriad security holes. The number of known security holes rose 124to 2,437 last year. Computer attacks shot up 160to more than 52,000, says the Computer Emergency Response Team. Last year alone, the devastating Code Red virus and its more invasive cousin, the Nimda worm, struck hundreds of thousands of computers, together causing more than $3 billion in damages. The problem only looks to get worse. Research firm IDC predicts that by 2005 companies and organizations will spend $14 billion fending off cyberintruders, up from $5 billion in 2000. Last fall, President Bush named Richard Clarke his cyberterrorism czar to address the threat of cyberattacks. And Microsoft Chairman Bill Gates recently declared security the software giant's No. 1 priority -- ordering 8,000 programmers to spend a month concentrating on it. Yet no one expects software makers alone to solve the problem. Computer users can do much to deflect cyberattacks. That's where the center comes in. A non-profit entity, it was conceived in 2000 by some of the USA's best computer-security minds: Alan Paller, research director at the Sans Institute computer-security think tank; Frank Reeder, then a privacy expert on the White House staff; and Jeffrey Hunker, then the National Security Council's senior director for critical infrastructure. The three organized a meeting of 20 banking, manufacturing, government and security officials at Washington, D.C.'s exclusive Cosmos Club, haunt of the intellectual elite. The discussion turned to how difficult it had become to keep track of security holes and patches proliferating across networks. Working for the common good The group decided it was time to put aside competitive fears and form a consensus-making body to establish a set of minimum security standards. ''The circumstances called for an honest effort to do the right thing and be good corporate citizens,'' recalls Reeder, the center's chairman. The center has moved quickly to empower computer users by: * Issuing benchmarks. The center's 170 members, which include financial institutions, government agencies, technology companies and professional groups, hashed out ''best practices benchmarks'' for configuring operating systems. The benchmarks are a response to software makers' habit of configuring software with every possible feature turned on so that every computer, for instance, could handle e-mail, host Web pages, play video files and connect with wireless devices. But often, a company may use one computer to do just one thing, say host a Web page. If that computer's operating system stays set up to handle e-mail and everything else, it provides more doors for hackers to break through. The benchmarks, drawn up and tested by center volunteers, outline steps for disabling unused features and keeping up to date on installing security patches. ''They've got bulletproof methodology,'' says Charles LeGrand, technologies practice director for the Institute of Internal Auditors, a professional association of 75,000 corporate auditors. * Keeping it simple. The center also makes available a tool designed to walk a technician through simple steps to bring an operating system in compliance with its benchmarks. A tool to check Sun Microsystem's Solaris operating system, for instance, requires a technician to make decisions about 64 items. Though set up a bit differently, a tool to tighten down Microsoft's Windows 2000 operating system presents a similar set of choices. ''The center is making it possible for normal people who aren't big experts to understand what they can do today to protect their computer systems,'' co-founder Paller says. * Keeping score. The center's tools also provide a security rating based on a 1 to 10 scale -- so that tech managers can better quantify how secure their systems are. When Virginia Tech first ran the Solaris tool on its Sun servers, it scored 3.67. Its Windows 2000 servers fared even worse, scoring just 1.6. By applying the benchmarks, Marchany raised the Solaris rating to 8.17 and Windows to 5.5. ''Right now, the only way to demonstrate you're making progress is to say you didn't get broken into last week,'' says John Stewart, chief security officer at Digital Island, a Web-hosting company. ''This gives you a numerical technique by which to demonstrate progress, and that's typically what a CEO wants to see.'' Getting the word out Benchmarks for Sun Microsystem's Solaris and Microsoft's Windows 2000 operating systems were finished last summer and fall, respectively. About 20,000 copies of each have been downloaded from the center's Web site, www.cisecurity.org. Recently, a Webcast to unveil benchmarks for Cisco System routers -- which direct traffic across the Internet -- drew more than 7,000 listeners. And work is underway on the Linux, Hewlett-Packard and IBM operating systems. The center's Web site is packed with testimonials from tech managers, including those from Hallmark Cards, Caterpillar, PricewaterhouseCoopers and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Ron Baklarz, chief information security officer at the American Red Cross, recently stumbled across the Windows 2000 benchmarks and became a big believer. ''It was easy to install and run. And it gives you some real valid information,'' Baklarz says. Baklarz has already e-mailed several colleagues about the benchmarks and plans to begin demonstrating the Windows tool to the technicians who tend the Red Cross' 10,000 computers. ''This just makes my job easier,'' he says. ''When I show them what the tool uncovers, they'll be more apt to tie things down and secure them.'' The center's progress also has caught the attention of Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., who has proposed legislation -- the Cybersecurity Preparedness Act of 2002 -- mandating the use of ''best practices'' by all federal agencies. If the bill becomes law, the center's benchmarks likely would be used by the government. A companion bill would provide grants for research into more sophisticated tools. A Senate committee is reviewing the bills. For the public good The center's rising visibility hasn't escaped the software makers. ''It's a complementary initiative,'' says Steve Lipner, Microsoft director of security assurance. ''We basically support anything that helps our customers focus on security issues.'' But neither Microsoft nor Sun has plans to embrace the benchmarks. ''The driver of a decision like that would be what our customers want,'' says Sun spokesman Russ Castronovo, noting that it, too, provides security tools. Until the center got rolling, there were no established standards for network security. Companies and organizations did things their way, ignorant of insights discovered by others. Reeder likens the situation to the practice of medicine in the 19th century. ''You had an awful lot of well-intentioned people doing different things, some of it good, some of it bad,'' he says. ''But who knew washing your hands between patients was such a good thing? ''What we're doing here is on the level of wash your hands between patients, along with providing a level of detail that tells people what to do,'' he says. Much work remains to be done in refining the benchmarks, Reeder says. So far, the center's crack software engineers seem willing to pour volunteer hours into the task -- driven by self-interest and an eagerness to contribute to a greater good. Security experts realize hackers roam the Net in search of open computers from which to mount ''denial-of-service'' attacks that can shut down any system touching the Net. ''It's no longer good enough to clean up your own systems and build up big fences,'' says Hal Pomerantz of Deer Run Associates, the security consultant who oversaw work on the Solaris benchmarks. ''It's up to me to help everybody do the same, because if I don't, their systems are going to be used to attack me.'' 

New Method Said to Solve Key Problem in Math 

August 8, 2002 

By SARA ROBINSON 

Three Indian computer scientists have solved a longstanding mathematics problem by devising a way for a computer to tell quickly and definitively whether a number is prime - that is, whether it is evenly divisible only by itself and 1. Prime numbers play a crucial role in cryptography, so devising fast ways to identify them is important. Current computer recipes, or algorithms, are fast, but have a small chance of giving either a wrong answer or no answer at all. The new algorithm - by Manindra Agrawal, Neeraj Kayal and Nitin Saxena of the Indian Institute of Technology in Kanpur - guarantees a correct and timely answer. Though their paper has not been published yet, they have distributed it to leading mathematicians, who expressed excitement at the finding. "This was one of the big unsolved problems in theoretical computer science and computational number theory," said Shafi Goldwasser, a professor of computer science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel. "It's the best result I've heard in over 10 years." The new algorithm has no immediate applications, since existing ones are faster and their error probability can be made so small that it is practically zero. Still, for mathematicians and computer scientists, the new algorithm represents a great achievement because, they said, it simply and elegantly solves a problem that has challenged many of the best minds in the field for decades. Asked why he had the courage to work on a problem that had stymied so many, Dr. Agrawal replied in an e-mail message: "Ours was a completely new and unexplored approach. Consequently, it gave us hope that we might succeed." The paper is now posted on the computer science department Web page at the Indian Institute of Technology (www.cse.iitk.ac.in). Methods of determining whether a number is prime have captivated mathematicians since ancient times because understanding prime numbers is the key to solving many important mathematical problems. More recently, attention has focused on tests that run efficiently on a computer, because such tests are part of the underlying mathematics of several widely used systems for encrypting data on computers. So-called primality testing plays a crucial role in the widely used RSA algorithm, whose security relies on the difficulty of finding a number's prime factors. RSA is used to secure transactions over the Internet. On Sunday, the researchers e-mailed a draft of the paper on the result to dozens of expert mathematicians and computer scientists. Dr. Carl Pomerance, a mathematician at Bell Labs, said he received the paper on Monday morning and determined it was correct. After discussing the draft with colleagues over lunch, Dr. Pomerance arranged an impromptu seminar on the result that afternoon. That he could prepare and give a seminar on the paper so quickly was "a measure of how wonderfully elegant this algorithm is," Dr. Pomerance said. "This algorithm is beautiful."

  http://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/08/science/08MATH.html?ex=1029991744&ei=1&en=6f1b8044c9576205